Protecting and restoring Europe's waters: An analysis of the future development needs of the Water Framework Directive

Охрана и восстановление водных ресурсов Европы: анализ потребностей в дальнейшем развитии Водной рамочной директивы
María Teresa Ferreira, Sergi Sabater, Kristian Meissner, Ángel Borja, Bruna Grizzetti, Daniel Hering, Kirsty Blackstock, Markus Venohr, Laurence Carvalho, Eleanor B. Mackay, Ana Cristina Cardoso, Annette Baattrup‐Pedersen, Sebastian Birk, Gábor Borics, Christian K. Feld, Lidija Globevnik, Sarah Hendry, Martyn Kelly, Sindre Langaas, Yiannis Panagopoulos, Ellis Penning, Josselin Rouillard, Ursula Schmedtje, Bryan M. Spears, Wouter van de Bund, Anne Lyche Solheim
2018-12-18

Water Framework Directiveaquatic ecosystem protectionearth observationriver basin managementwater quality monitoring
The Water Framework Directive (WFD) is a pioneering piece of legislation that aims to protect and enhance aquatic ecosystems and promote sustainable water use across Europe. There is growing concern that the objective of good status, or higher, in all EU waters by 2027 is a long way from being achieved in many countries. Through questionnaire analysis of almost 100 experts, we provide recommendations to enhance WFD monitoring and assessment systems, improve programmes of measures and further integrate with other sectoral policies. Our analysis highlights that there is great potential to enhance assessment schemes through strategic design of monitoring networks and innovation, such as earth observation. New diagnostic tools that use existing WFD monitoring data, but incorporate novel statistical and trait-based approaches could be used more widely to diagnose the cause of deterioration under conditions of multiple pressures and deliver a hierarchy of solutions for more evidence-driven decisions in river basin management. There is also a growing recognition that measures undertaken in river basin management should deliver multiple benefits across sectors, such as reduced flood risk, and there needs to be robust demonstration studies that evaluate these. Continued efforts in 'mainstreaming' water policy into other policy sectors is clearly needed to deliver wider success with WFD goals, particularly with agricultural policy. Other key policy areas where a need for stronger integration with water policy was recognised included urban planning (waste water treatment), flooding, climate and energy (hydropower). Having a deadline for attaining the policy objective of good status is important, but even more essential is to have a permanent framework for river basin management that addresses the delays in implementation of measures. This requires a long-term perspective, far beyond the current deadline of 2027.
1
Achieving the Water Framework Directive’s goal of good status or higher in all European waters by 2027 remains unlikely in many countries.
2
Nearly 100 experts recommend strategically designed monitoring networks, earth observation, and other innovations to strengthen WFD assessment systems.
3
Novel statistical and trait-based diagnostic tools using existing monitoring data could identify deterioration causes under multiple pressures and support evidence-driven solution hierarchies.
4
River-basin measures should be evaluated for multiple cross-sector benefits, including reduced flood risk, through robust demonstration studies.
5
WFD implementation requires stronger integration with agriculture, urban wastewater planning, flood management, climate, and energy policies, alongside a permanent long-term river-basin management framework beyond 2027.

Europe’s Water Framework Directive (WFD) implementation for protecting and restoring aquatic ecosystems and achieving good status in EU waters

Future development needs and improvement strategies for WFD monitoring, assessment, measures, and integration with other sectoral policies in river basin management

Publication Details
Publication Date
2018-12-18
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
María Teresa Ferreira
Sergi Sabater
Kristian Meissner
Ángel Borja
Bruna Grizzetti
Daniel Hering
Kirsty Blackstock
Markus Venohr
Laurence Carvalho
Eleanor B. Mackay
Ana Cristina Cardoso
Annette Baattrup‐Pedersen
Sebastian Birk
Gábor Borics
Christian K. Feld
Lidija Globevnik
Sarah Hendry
Martyn Kelly
Sindre Langaas
Yiannis Panagopoulos
Ellis Penning
Josselin Rouillard
Ursula Schmedtje
Bryan M. Spears
Wouter van de Bund
Anne Lyche Solheim
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%