Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Colchicine after Myocardial Infarction

Эффективность и безопасность низких доз колхицина после инфаркта миокарда
Rafael Díaz, José López‐Sendón, Colin Berry, Petr Ošťádal, Fausto J. Pinto, Marie‐Pierre Dubé, David Rhainds, Olivier F. Bertrand, Aldo P. Maggioni, Wolfgang Köenig, Philippe L. L’Allier, Denis Angoulvant, David D. Waters, Marie‐Claude Guertin, Habib Gamra, François Roubille, Jean‐Claude Tardif, Simon Kouz, Ghassan S. Kiwan, Mylène Provencher, Andreas Orfanos, Lucie Blondeau, Réda Ibrahim, Jean C. Grégoire, Marc-André Lavoie
2019-11-16

inflammationischemic cardiovascular eventslow-dose colchicinemyocardial infarctionrandomized double-blind trial
BACKGROUND: Experimental and clinical evidence supports the role of inflammation in atherosclerosis and its complications. Colchicine is an orally administered, potent antiinflammatory medication that is indicated for the treatment of gout and pericarditis. METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind trial involving patients recruited within 30 days after a myocardial infarction. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg once daily) or placebo. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, resuscitated cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, stroke, or urgent hospitalization for angina leading to coronary revascularization. The components of the primary end point and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 4745 patients were enrolled; 2366 patients were assigned to the colchicine group, and 2379 to the placebo group. Patients were followed for a median of 22.6 months. The primary end point occurred in 5.5% of the patients in the colchicine group, as compared with 7.1% of those in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61 to 0.96; P = 0.02). The hazard ratios were 0.84 (95% CI, 0.46 to 1.52) for death from cardiovascular causes, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.25 to 2.73) for resuscitated cardiac arrest, 0.91 (95% CI, 0.68 to 1.21) for myocardial infarction, 0.26 (95% CI, 0.10 to 0.70) for stroke, and 0.50 (95% CI, 0.31 to 0.81) for urgent hospitalization for angina leading to coronary revascularization. Diarrhea was reported in 9.7% of the patients in the colchicine group and in 8.9% of those in the placebo group (P = 0.35). Pneumonia was reported as a serious adverse event in 0.9% of the patients in the colchicine group and in 0.4% of those in the placebo group (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with a recent myocardial infarction, colchicine at a dose of 0.5 mg daily led to a significantly lower risk of ischemic cardiovascular events than placebo. (Funded by the Government of Quebec and others; COLCOT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02551094.).
1
Colchicine was associated with substantially lower risks of stroke and urgent hospitalization for angina requiring coronary revascularization.
2
Daily colchicine at 0.5 mg significantly lowered ischemic cardiovascular event risk after recent myocardial infarction, with a potential pneumonia safety signal.
3
In a randomized double-blind trial of 4,745 recent myocardial infarction patients, low-dose colchicine reduced composite ischemic cardiovascular events versus placebo.
4
Over a median 22.6-month follow-up, the primary endpoint occurred in 5.5% with colchicine versus 7.1% with placebo (hazard ratio 0.77; P=0.02).
5
Rates of diarrhea were similar between groups, but serious pneumonia occurred more frequently with colchicine (0.9% versus 0.4%; P=0.03).

Patients within 30 days after myocardial infarction treated with low-dose colchicine or placebo

Efficacy and safety of low-dose colchicine in preventing ischemic cardiovascular events

Publication Details
Publication Date
2019-11-16
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Rafael Díaz
José López‐Sendón
Colin Berry
Petr Ošťádal
Fausto J. Pinto
Marie‐Pierre Dubé
David Rhainds
Olivier F. Bertrand
Aldo P. Maggioni
Wolfgang Köenig
Philippe L. L’Allier
Denis Angoulvant
David D. Waters
Marie‐Claude Guertin
Habib Gamra
François Roubille
Jean‐Claude Tardif
Simon Kouz
Ghassan S. Kiwan
Mylène Provencher
Andreas Orfanos
Lucie Blondeau
Réda Ibrahim
Jean C. Grégoire
Marc-André Lavoie
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%