Innovation networks of industry and business‐related services—relations between innovation intensity of firms and regional inter‐firm cooperation
Инновационные сети промышленности и деловых услуг — взаимосвязь между интенсивностью инноваций на предприятиях и региональной межфирменной кооперацией
1999-12-01
SCID: 54.1/bgnarqpn
Discuss with AI
innovation intensityinnovation networksinter-firm cooperationinterregional networkingprobit models
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
The hypothesis is put forward in this paper that the innovation activity of a firm also reflects its ability to interact with other partners. It is assumed that innovation intensive manufacturing and service firms, defined by a share of innovation expenditures in turnover of above 3.5%, strongly interact with other partners in the innovation process and that by learning effects, accumulated knowledge and a higher absorption capacity the spatial search radius for potential cooperation partners is increased, resulting in a wide spatial range of networking relations. Using data from a German regional innovation survey, probit models reveal that innovation intensive firms do indeed exhibit a stronger emphasis on interregional networking. Access to external knowledge sources seems to be more important for service than for manufacturing firms, for which a clear knowledge contributing effect of service assistance in the innovation process could not be detected. Interregional differences in networking behaviour exist in a way that firms in central regions show a higher probability for interregional interactions, while in rural areas intraregional contacts dominate.
Key Findings
1
External knowledge sources are more important for service firms than for manufacturing firms in supporting innovation processes.
2
Higher innovation intensity is associated with broader spatial searches for cooperation partners, consistent with learning, accumulated knowledge, and greater absorptive capacity.
3
Innovation-intensive firms, defined as spending above 3.5% of turnover on innovation, show stronger interregional networking than less innovation-intensive firms.
4
Regional context shapes networking: firms in central regions more often interact interregionally, whereas rural firms predominantly maintain intraregional contacts.
5
The study finds no clear knowledge-contributing effect of service assistance for manufacturing firms’ innovation processes.
Research Object
Innovation-intensive manufacturing and business-related service firms in German regions
Research Subject
The relationship between firms’ innovation intensity and the spatial scope and sectoral pattern of inter-firm cooperation in innovation networks
Publication Details
Publication Date
1999-12-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest