Modeling of surfactant and surfactant–polymer flooding for enhanced oil recovery using STARS (CMG) software
Моделирование заводнения поверхностно-активным веществом и системой «поверхностно-активное вещество–полимер» для повышения нефтеотдачи с использованием программного обеспечения STARS (CMG)
2014-03-12
SCID: 54.1/bkvbcshu
Discuss with AI
STARS (CMG) softwareenhanced oil recoverypartially hydrolyzed polyacrylamidesurfactant floodingsurfactant–polymer flooding
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Chemical flooding methods are now getting importance in enhanced oil recovery to recover the trapped oil after conventional recovery. Investigation has been made to characterize the surfactant solution in terms of its ability to reduce the surface tension and the interaction between surfactant and polymer in its aqueous solution. A series of flooding experiments have been carried out to find the additional recovery using surfactant and surfactant–polymer slug. Approximately 0.5 pore volume (PV) surfactant (sodium dodecylsulfate) slug was injected in surfactant flooding, while 0.3 PV surfactant slug and 0.2 PV polymer (partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide) slug were injected for surfactant–polymer flooding. In each case, chase water was used to maintain the pressure gradient. The present work sought to determine whether or not a commercially available simulator could accurately simulate results from core flooding experiments. The adherence to physically realistic input values with respect to experimentally derived parameters was of primary importance during the development of the models. When specific values were not available for certain simulation parameters, a reasonable range of assumptions was made and both the water cut and cumulative oil production were successfully matched. Ultimately, understanding how to simulate the surfactant and polymer behavior on a core scale will improve the ability to model polymer floods on the field scale.
Key Findings
1
Core flooding experiments used approximately 0.5 PV sodium dodecyl sulfate, or 0.3 PV surfactant followed by 0.2 PV partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide.
2
Core-scale simulation of surfactant and polymer behavior can support improved field-scale modeling of polymer flooding.
3
STARS (CMG) models successfully matched experimental water-cut and cumulative oil-production results using physically realistic parameters and reasonable assumptions.
4
Surfactant and surfactant–polymer flooding were investigated for recovering oil trapped after conventional recovery methods.
5
Surfactant-solution characterization focused on surface-tension reduction and surfactant–polymer interactions in aqueous solution.
Research Object
Surfactant and surfactant–polymer flooding of oil-bearing cores for enhanced oil recovery
Research Subject
Simulation and experimental matching of additional oil recovery, water cut, and cumulative oil production, including surfactant–polymer interactions and slug behavior
Publication Details
Publication Date
2014-03-12
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest