Repoliticization Through Search and Rescue? Humanitarian NGOs and Migration Management in the Central Mediterranean

Реполитизация посредством поисково-спасательных операций? Гуманитарные НПО и управление миграцией в центральной части Средиземного моря
Paolo Cuttitta
2017-07-17

Central Mediterraneanhumanitarian NGOsmigration managementrepoliticizationsearch and rescue
This article analyses the search and rescue (SAR) activities carried out by three NGOs (MOAS, MSF and Sea-Watch) in the Central Mediterranean, and asks whether and in how far non-governmental SAR contributes to the repoliticization of the EU maritime border. The article first introduces the concept of depoliticization/repoliticization, as well as that of humanitarianization. Two sections summarize the development of the SAR regime and the governmentalization of international waters in the Strait of Sicily from the Cap Anamur case to 2016, and from late 2016 to recent days. Against this backdrop, the article analyses the different political positions taken by MOAS, MSF and Sea-Watch, their operational activities, as well as their cooperation and relations with the other actors involved in SAR. The three NGOs react differently to the contradictions that are typical of humanitarian non-state action. MOAS keeps a neutral political profile, whereas MSF and Sea-Watch regard their SAR activities as part of a political, not only humanitarian commitment. While the convergence of delocalized state sovereignty and humanitarian reason leaves hardly any room for manoeuvre, MSF and Sea-Watch try to question and contrast governmental policies and practices, as well as to turn international waters into a political stage from which they can make their voice heard and on which they can play the watchdog role.
1
MOAS maintains a politically neutral profile, while MSF and Sea-Watch frame search and rescue as both humanitarian and political commitments.
2
MSF and Sea-Watch challenge governmental migration policies and practices and use international waters as a political stage for advocacy and watchdog activity.
3
The article finds that NGO search-and-rescue activities can contribute to repoliticizing the EU maritime border, but their effects vary by organization.
4
The convergence of delocalized state sovereignty and humanitarian governance substantially constrains NGOs’ room for political maneuver.
5
The three NGOs respond differently to the contradictions inherent in humanitarian non-state action, producing divergent relationships with other search-and-rescue actors.

Search and rescue activities of MOAS, MSF, and Sea-Watch in the Central Mediterranean

The extent to which non-governmental search and rescue repoliticizes the EU maritime border through NGOs’ political positions, operational practices, and relations with other SAR actors

Publication Details
Publication Date
2017-07-17
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Paolo Cuttitta
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%