TRiSM for Agentic AI: A review of Trust, Risk, and Security Management in LLM-based Agentic Multi-Agent Systems

TRiSM для агентного искусственного интеллекта: обзор управления доверием, рисками и безопасностью в агентных мультиагентных системах на основе больших языковых моделей
Shaina Raza, Ranjan Sapkota, Manoj Karkee, Christos Emmanouilidis
2026-01-01

Agentic AIComponent Synergy Score (CSS)LLM-based multi-agent systemsTool Utilization Efficacy (TUE)Trust, Risk, and Security Management (TRiSM)
Agentic AI systems, built upon large language models (LLMs) and deployed in multi-agent configurations, are redefining intelligence, autonomy, collaboration, and decision-making across enterprise and societal domains. This review presents a structured analysis of Trust, Risk, and Security Management (TRiSM) in the context of LLM-based Agentic Multi-Agent Systems (AMAS). We begin by examining the conceptual foundations of Agentic AI and highlight its architectural distinctions from traditional AI agents. We then adapt and extend the AI TRiSM framework for Agentic AI, structured around key pillars: Explainability, ModelOps, Security, Privacy and their Lifecycle Governance , each contextualized to the challenges of AMAS. A risk taxonomy is proposed to capture the unique threats and vulnerabilities of Agentic AI, ranging from coordination failures to prompt-based adversarial manipulation. To make coordination and tool use measurable in practice, we propose two metrics: the Component Synergy Score (CSS), which captures inter-agent enablement, and the Tool Utilization Efficacy (TUE), which evaluates whether tools are invoked correctly and efficiently. We further discuss strategies for improving explainability in Agentic AI, as well as approaches to enhancing security and privacy through encryption, adversarial robustness, and regulatory compliance. The review concludes with a research roadmap for the responsible development and deployment of Agentic AI, highlighting key directions to align emerging systems with TRiSM principles-ensuring safety, transparency, and accountability in their operation.
1
It identifies encryption, adversarial robustness, regulatory compliance, and improved explainability as strategies for strengthening security, privacy, and accountability in Agentic AI.
2
It proposes a risk taxonomy covering Agentic AI-specific threats, including multi-agent coordination failures and prompt-based adversarial manipulation.
3
The paper outlines a research roadmap for responsible Agentic AI development and deployment aligned with safety, transparency, and accountability principles.
4
The review adapts and extends the AI TRiSM framework for LLM-based Agentic Multi-Agent Systems across explainability, ModelOps, security, privacy, and lifecycle governance.
5
The review introduces Component Synergy Score (CSS) to measure inter-agent enablement and Tool Utilization Efficacy (TUE) to assess correct and efficient tool invocation.

LLM-based Agentic Multi-Agent Systems (AMAS)

Trust, Risk, and Security Management, including explainability, lifecycle governance, security, privacy, risk taxonomy, and coordination/tool-use effectiveness

Publication Details
Publication Date
2026-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
40
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Shaina Raza
Ranjan Sapkota
Manoj Karkee
Christos Emmanouilidis
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%