The role of surface charge in cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of medical nanoparticles
Роль поверхностного заряда в клеточном поглощении и цитотоксичности медицинских наночастиц
2012-11-01
SCID: 54.1/bsaqn7cg
Discuss with AI
cellular uptakeintracellular localizationmedical nanoparticlesnanoparticle cytotoxicitysurface charge
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Many types of nanoparticles (NPs) are tested for use in medical products, particularly in imaging and gene and drug delivery. For these applications, cellular uptake is usually a prerequisite and is governed in addition to size by surface characteristics such as hydrophobicity and charge. Although positive charge appears to improve the efficacy of imaging, gene transfer, and drug delivery, a higher cytotoxicity of such constructs has been reported. This review summarizes findings on the role of surface charge on cytotoxicity in general, action on specific cellular targets, modes of toxic action, cellular uptake, and intracellular localization of NPs. Effects of serum and intercell type differences are addressed. Cationic NPs cause more pronounced disruption of plasma-membrane integrity, stronger mitochondrial and lysosomal damage, and a higher number of autophagosomes than anionic NPs. In general, nonphagocytic cells ingest cationic NPs to a higher extent, but charge density and hydrophobicity are equally important; phagocytic cells preferentially take up anionic NPs. Cells do not use different uptake routes for cationic and anionic NPs, but high uptake rates are usually linked to greater biological effects. The different uptake preferences of phagocytic and nonphagocytic cells for cationic and anionic NPs may influence the efficacy and selectivity of NPs for drug delivery and imaging.
Key Findings
1
Cationic and anionic nanoparticles generally use the same cellular uptake routes; higher uptake is usually associated with stronger biological effects.
2
Cationic nanoparticles produce greater plasma-membrane disruption, mitochondrial and lysosomal damage, and autophagosome formation than anionic nanoparticles.
3
Charge-dependent uptake preferences between phagocytic and nonphagocytic cells may affect nanoparticle efficacy and selectivity in drug delivery and imaging.
4
Nonphagocytic cells generally internalize cationic nanoparticles more efficiently, whereas phagocytic cells preferentially take up anionic nanoparticles.
5
Surface charge strongly influences nanoparticle cellular uptake, cytotoxicity, intracellular localization, and biological effects alongside size, hydrophobicity, and charge density.
Research Object
Medical nanoparticles (NPs) used for imaging, gene and drug delivery
Research Subject
The effects of surface charge, charge density, and hydrophobicity on nanoparticle cellular uptake, cytotoxicity, cellular targets, toxic mechanisms, and intracellular localization across phagocytic and nonphagocytic cells
Publication Details
Publication Date
2012-11-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest