Echolocation in Oilbirds and swiftlets

Эхолокация у гуахаро и саланган
M. Brock Fenton, Signe Brinkløv, John M. Ratcliffe
2013-01-01

Oilbirdavian auditory systembiosonar signalsbird echolocationswiftlets
The discovery of ultrasonic bat echolocation prompted a wide search for other animal biosonar systems, which yielded, among few others, two avian groups. One, the South American Oilbird (Steatornis caripensis: Caprimulgiformes), is nocturnal and eats fruit. The other is a selection of diurnal, insect-eating swiftlets (species in the genera Aerodramus and Collocalia: Apodidae) from across the Indo-Pacific. Bird echolocation is restricted to lower frequencies audible to humans, implying a system of poorer resolution than the ultrasonic (>20 kHz) biosonar of most bats and toothed whales. As such, bird echolocation has been labeled crude or rudimentary. Yet, echolocation is found in at least 16 extant bird species and has evolved several times in avian lineages. Birds use their syringes to produce broadband click-type biosonar signals that allow them to nest in dark caves and tunnels, probably with less predation pressure. There are ongoing discrepancies about several details of bird echolocation, from signal design to the question about whether echolocation is used during foraging. It remains to be seen if bird echolocation is as sophisticated as that of tongue-clicking rousette bats. Bird echolocation performance appears to be superior to that of blind humans using signals of notable similarity. However, no apparent specializations have been found so far in the birds' auditory system (from middle ear to higher processing centers). The advent of light-weight recording equipment and custom software for examining signals and reconstructing flight paths now provides the potential to study the echolocation behavior of birds in more detail and resolve such issues.
1
Avian echolocation operates at lower frequencies than most bat and toothed-whale biosonar, suggesting poorer spatial resolution, though its actual sophistication remains unresolved.
2
Bird echolocation performance appears superior to that of blind humans using broadly similar signals, despite no identified specializations in the avian auditory system.
3
Echolocation has evolved multiple times in birds and is documented in at least 16 extant species, including oilbirds and several swiftlets.
4
Key uncertainties remain about avian signal design and whether echolocation contributes to foraging; lightweight recording and flight-path reconstruction tools may resolve them.
5
Oilbirds and swiftlets produce broadband, audible-frequency click signals with their syrinxes, enabling navigation and nesting in dark caves and tunnels.

Echolocation systems and behavior in oilbirds and swiftlets

Signal characteristics, functional performance, evolutionary occurrence, and use of avian echolocation for navigation and foraging

Publication Details
Publication Date
2013-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
M. Brock Fenton
Signe Brinkløv
John M. Ratcliffe
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%