Autism and social robotics: A systematic review
Аутизм и социальная робототехника: систематический обзор
2015-10-20
SCID: 54.1/c3wfsyf5
Discuss with AI
Autism Spectrum DisordersPRISMA systematic reviewPROSPERO registrationrobot-assisted therapysocial robotics
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Social robotics could be a promising method for Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) treatment. The aim of this article is to carry out a systematic literature review of the studies on this topic that were published in the last 10 years. We tried to address the following questions: can social robots be a useful tool in autism therapy? We followed the PRISMA guidelines, and the protocol was registered within PROSPERO database (CRD42015016158). We found many positive implications in the use of social robots in therapy as for example: ASD subjects often performed better with a robot partner rather than a human partner; sometimes, ASD patients had, toward robots, behaviors that TD patients had toward human agents; ASDs had a lot of social behaviors toward robots; during robotic sessions, ASDs showed reduced repetitive and stereotyped behaviors and, social robots manage to improve spontaneous language during therapy sessions. Therefore, robots provide therapists and researchers a means to connect with autistic subjects in an easier way, but studies in this area are still insufficient. It is necessary to clarify whether sex, intelligence quotient, and age of participants affect the outcome of therapy and whether any beneficial effects only occur during the robotic session or if they are still observable outside the clinical/experimental context.
Key Findings
1
ASD subjects often performed better with a robot partner than with a human partner in therapeutic/experimental contexts.
2
Individuals with ASD displayed many social behaviors toward robots during interactions.
3
Robotic sessions were associated with reduced repetitive and stereotyped behaviors in ASD participants.
4
Robots offer therapists and researchers an easier means to connect with autistic subjects, but existing studies are still insufficient.
5
Social robots helped improve spontaneous language during therapy sessions with ASD individuals.
6
Some ASD patients treated robots similarly to how typically developing (TD) patients treat human agents.
7
Systematic review of last 10 years following PRISMA and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42015016158).
8
Unclear whether participant sex, IQ, and age modulate therapy outcomes and whether benefits persist outside robotic sessions.
Research Object
Use of social robots in therapy for individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD)
Research Subject
Effects and therapeutic outcomes of social-robot interventions on autistic participants' social behaviors, repetitive/stereotyped behaviors, spontaneous language, and comparative performance versus human partners, including moderators like age, sex, and IQ
Publication Details
Publication Date
2015-10-20
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest