Foreign Direct Investment in Africa: The Role of Natural Resources, Market Size, Government Policy, Institutions and Political Instability
Прямые иностранные инвестиции в Африку: роль природных ресурсов, размера рынка, государственной политики, институтов и политической нестабильности
2006-01-01
SCID: 54.1/cdq3z7yr
Discuss with AI
foreign direct investmentgovernment policyinstitutional qualitynatural resourcespolitical instability
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Data from several investor surveys suggest that macroeconomic instability, investment restrictions, corruption and political instability have a negative impact on foreign direct investment (FDI) to Africa. However, the relationship between FDI and these country characteristics has not been studied. This paper uses panel data for 22 countries over the period 1984–2000 to examine the impact of natural resources, market size, government policies, political instability and the quality of the host country's institutions on FDI. It also analyses the importance of natural resources and market size vis-à-vis government policy and the host country's institutions in directing FDI flows. The main result is that natural resources and large markets promote FDI. However, lower inflation, good infrastructure, an educated population, openness to FDI, less corruption, political stability and a reliable legal system have a similar effect. A benchmark specification shows that a decline in the corruption from the level of Nigeria to that of South Africa has the same positive effect on FDI as increasing the share of fuels and minerals in total exports by about 35 per cent. These results suggest that countries that are small or lack natural resources can attract FDI by improving their institutions and policy environment.
Key Findings
1
Natural resources and larger markets promote FDI inflows, but lower inflation, better infrastructure, education, openness, reduced corruption, political stability, and reliable legal systems have similar effects.
2
Panel data from 22 African countries over 1984–2000 is used to evaluate how resources, market size, policies, institutions, and political instability affect FDI.
3
Reducing corruption from Nigeria’s level to South Africa’s level has the same positive FDI effect as increasing fuels and minerals’ export share by about 35%.
4
Small countries or those lacking natural resources can attract FDI by improving institutional quality and their policy environment.
Research Object
Foreign direct investment (FDI) flows to 22 African countries during 1984–2000
Research Subject
The effects and relative importance of natural resources, market size, government policies, political instability, and host-country institutional quality in directing FDI flows
Publication Details
Publication Date
2006-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest