UNUSUAL CAUSES AND PRESENTATIONS OF HEMIFACIAL SPASM

Необычные причины и клинические проявления гемифациального спазма
Inbo Han, Jong Hee Chang, Jin Woo Chang, Ryoong Huh, Sang Sup Chung
2009-07-01

dolichoectatic vertebrobasilar arteryhemifacial spasmmicrovascular decompressionneurovascular compressionvascular malformation
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate unusual possible causes and clinical presentations of hemifacial spasm (HFS). METHODS: The authors reviewed 1642 cases of HFS. Assessments were based on clinical features, 3-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography, and surgical findings. Causes other than neurovascular compression at the root exit zone of the facial nerve were investigated and unusual clinical presentations were noted. RESULTS: Nine (0.5%) patients had a secondary causative structural lesion, 7 patients had a tumor, and the remaining 2 had a vascular malformation. Direct compression by dolichoectatic vertebrobasilar artery was noted in 12 (0.7%) patients. In 7 (0.4%) patients, only the distal portion of the facial nerve was compressed, and five (0.3%) had only venous compression. Bilateral HFS and tic convulsif were encountered in 7 (0.4%) and 6 (0.37%) patients, respectively. Fifty-six (3.4%) patients were younger than 30 years old at the time of microvascular decompression. CONCLUSION: HFS can result from tumor, vascular malformation, and dolichoectatic artery. Therefore, appropriate preoperative radiological investigations are crucial to achieve a correct diagnosis. The authors emphasize that distal compression or only venous compression can be responsible for persistent or recurrent symptoms postoperatively. In cases of bilateral HFS, a definite differential diagnosis is necessary for appropriate therapy. MVD is recommended as the treatment of choice in patients younger than 30 years old or patients with painful tic convulsif.
1
Among 1,642 hemifacial spasm cases, 0.5% were caused by secondary structural lesions, including tumors and vascular malformations.
2
Bilateral hemifacial spasm and tic convulsif occurred in 0.4% and 0.37% of patients, respectively, requiring careful differential diagnosis.
3
Distal facial-nerve compression occurred in 0.4% of patients, while isolated venous compression occurred in 0.3%, potentially explaining persistent or recurrent postoperative symptoms.
4
Dolichoectatic vertebrobasilar arteries directly compressed the facial nerve in 0.7% of patients.
5
Microvascular decompression is recommended for patients younger than 30 years or those with painful tic convulsif; thorough preoperative imaging is essential for diagnosis and treatment planning.

Hemifacial spasm and its secondary structural and vascular causes

Unusual etiologies, clinical presentations, and patterns of facial-nerve compression in hemifacial spasm

Publication Details
Publication Date
2009-07-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Inbo Han
Jong Hee Chang
Jin Woo Chang
Ryoong Huh
Sang Sup Chung
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%