UNUSUAL CAUSES AND PRESENTATIONS OF HEMIFACIAL SPASM
Необычные причины и клинические проявления гемифациального спазма
2009-07-01
SCID: 54.1/cjq442sh
Discuss with AI
dolichoectatic vertebrobasilar arteryhemifacial spasmmicrovascular decompressionneurovascular compressionvascular malformation
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate unusual possible causes and clinical presentations of hemifacial spasm (HFS). METHODS: The authors reviewed 1642 cases of HFS. Assessments were based on clinical features, 3-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography, and surgical findings. Causes other than neurovascular compression at the root exit zone of the facial nerve were investigated and unusual clinical presentations were noted. RESULTS: Nine (0.5%) patients had a secondary causative structural lesion, 7 patients had a tumor, and the remaining 2 had a vascular malformation. Direct compression by dolichoectatic vertebrobasilar artery was noted in 12 (0.7%) patients. In 7 (0.4%) patients, only the distal portion of the facial nerve was compressed, and five (0.3%) had only venous compression. Bilateral HFS and tic convulsif were encountered in 7 (0.4%) and 6 (0.37%) patients, respectively. Fifty-six (3.4%) patients were younger than 30 years old at the time of microvascular decompression. CONCLUSION: HFS can result from tumor, vascular malformation, and dolichoectatic artery. Therefore, appropriate preoperative radiological investigations are crucial to achieve a correct diagnosis. The authors emphasize that distal compression or only venous compression can be responsible for persistent or recurrent symptoms postoperatively. In cases of bilateral HFS, a definite differential diagnosis is necessary for appropriate therapy. MVD is recommended as the treatment of choice in patients younger than 30 years old or patients with painful tic convulsif.
Key Findings
1
Among 1,642 hemifacial spasm cases, 0.5% were caused by secondary structural lesions, including tumors and vascular malformations.
2
Bilateral hemifacial spasm and tic convulsif occurred in 0.4% and 0.37% of patients, respectively, requiring careful differential diagnosis.
3
Distal facial-nerve compression occurred in 0.4% of patients, while isolated venous compression occurred in 0.3%, potentially explaining persistent or recurrent postoperative symptoms.
4
Dolichoectatic vertebrobasilar arteries directly compressed the facial nerve in 0.7% of patients.
5
Microvascular decompression is recommended for patients younger than 30 years or those with painful tic convulsif; thorough preoperative imaging is essential for diagnosis and treatment planning.
Research Object
Hemifacial spasm and its secondary structural and vascular causes
Research Subject
Unusual etiologies, clinical presentations, and patterns of facial-nerve compression in hemifacial spasm
Publication Details
Publication Date
2009-07-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest