States and Social Revolutions
Государства и социальные революции
1979-02-28
SCID: 54.1/cnx243yf
Discuss with AI
class relationscomparative historical analysisinternational forcessocial revolutionsstate structures
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
State structures, international forces, and class relations: Theda Skocpol shows how all three combine to explain the origins and accomplishments of social-revolutionary transformations. From France in the 1790s to Vietnam in the 1970s, social revolutions have been rare but undeniably of enormous importance in modern world history. States and Social Revolutions provides a new frame of reference for analyzing the causes, the conflicts, and the outcomes of such revolutions. And it develops in depth a rigorous, comparative historical analysis of three major cases: the French Revolution of 1787 through the early 1800s, the Russian Revolution of 1917 through the 1930s, and the Chinese Revolution of 1911 through the 1960s. Believing that existing theories of revolution, both Marxist and non-Marxist, are inadequate to explain the actual historical patterns of revolutions, the author urges us to adopt fresh perspectives. Above all, she maintains that states conceived as administrative and coercive organizations potentially autonomous from class controls and interests must be made central to explanations of revolutions.
Key Findings
1
A rigorous comparative historical analysis of France (1787–early 1800s), Russia (1917–1930s), and China (1911–1960s) underpins the book's explanatory framework.
2
Existing theories of revolution, both Marxist and non-Marxist, are inadequate to explain historical revolution patterns, necessitating new perspectives.
3
Social revolutions are rare but have had enormous importance in modern world history, illustrated across diverse cases from the 1790s to the 1970s.
4
Social revolutions result from the combined effects of state structures, international forces, and class relations rather than any single factor.
5
States should be analyzed as potentially autonomous administrative and coercive organizations central to explaining revolutions.
Research Object
Social revolutions (comparative historical cases: French 1787–early 1800s, Russian 1917–1930s, Chinese 1911–1960s)
Research Subject
How state structures, international forces, and class relations combine to cause, shape, and determine the outcomes of social-revolutionary transformations
Publication Details
Publication Date
1979-02-28
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest