Nonmonotonic Elasticity of the Crude Oil–Brine Interface in Relation to Improved Oil Recovery
Немонотонная упругость границы раздела сырой нефти и рассола в связи с повышением нефтеотдачи
2016-02-03
SCID: 54.1/cx6xkzdf
Discuss with AI
enhanced oil recoveryinterfacial viscoelasticitylow-salinity brinemicrofluidic porous medianonionic surfactant
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Injection of optimized chemistry water in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) has gained much interest in the past few years. Crude oil-water interfaces can have a viscoelastic character affected by the adsorption of amphiphilic molecules. The brine concentration as well as surfactants may strongly affect the fluid-fluid interfacial viscoelasticity. In this work we investigate interfacial viscoelasticity of two different oils in terms of brine concentration and a nonionic surfactant. We correlate these measurements with oil recovery in a glass-etched flow microchannel. Interfacial viscoelasticity develops relatively fast in both oils, stabilizing at about 48 h. The interfaces are found to be more elastic than viscous. The interfacial elastic (G') and viscous (G″) moduli increase as the salt concentration decreases until a maximum in viscoelasticity is observed around 0.01 wt % of salt. Monovalent (Na(+)) and divalent (Mg(2+)) cations are used to investigate the effect of ion type; no difference is observed at low salinity. The introduction of a small amount of a surfactant (100 ppm) increases the elasticity of the crude oil-water interface at high salt concentration. Aqueous solutions that give the maximum interface viscoelasticity and high salinity brines are used to displace oil in a glass-etched "porous media" micromodel. Pressure fluctuations after breakthrough are observed in systems with high salt concentration while at low salt concentration there are no appreciable pressure fluctuations. Oil recovery increases by 5-10% in low salinity brines. By using a small amount of a nonionic surfactant with high salinity brine, oil recovery is enhanced 10% with no pressure fluctuations. Interface elasticity reduces the snap-off of the oil phase, leading to reduced pressure fluctuations. This study sheds light on significance of interface viscoelasticity in oil recovery by change in salt concentration and by addition of a small amount of a nonionic surfactant.
Key Findings
1
Adding 100 ppm nonionic surfactant increased crude oil–water interfacial elasticity at high salt concentration.
2
At low salinity, monovalent sodium and divalent magnesium ions produced no observable difference in interfacial viscoelasticity.
3
Elastic and viscous moduli increased as salt concentration decreased, reaching maximum viscoelasticity near 0.01 wt% salt.
4
Greater interface elasticity reduced oil-phase snap-off, suppressing post-breakthrough pressure fluctuations during microchannel displacement.
5
Interfacial viscoelasticity developed rapidly in both crude oils and stabilized after approximately 48 hours, with elasticity exceeding viscosity.
6
Low-salinity brines increased oil recovery by 5–10%, while surfactant-assisted high-salinity brine enhanced recovery by 10% without pressure fluctuations.
Research Object
Crude oil–brine interfaces and their displacement in a glass-etched porous-media micromodel under varying salinity and nonionic-surfactant conditions
Research Subject
Interfacial viscoelasticity and its relationship to pressure fluctuations, snap-off, and oil recovery
Publication Details
Publication Date
2016-02-03
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest