Thermal comfort of novel low-momentum ventilation concepts for passengers in long-distance trains
Тепловой комфорт при новых концепциях низкоимпульсной вентиляции для пассажиров в поездах дальнего следования
2023-03-13
SCID: 54.1/d3gwamby
Discuss with AI
cabin displacement ventilationhybrid ventilationlow-momentum ventilationmicrojet ventilationthermal comfort
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Thermal comfort is essential to increase the modal share of rail transport by attracting more passengers. In this study, three novel low-momentum ventilation concepts were analyzed regarding the thermal comfort of railway passengers and compared to a conventional ventilation setting. Using an experimental approach, objective measurements of climate parameters and subjective assessments from 146 test subjects in a generic train compartment were analyzed. Results revealed significant differences in perceived thermal comfort amongst the four ventilation settings. Subjects reported comparatively higher thermal comfort in hatrack integrated low-momentum ventilation and hybrid ventilation (HV) than in cabin displacement ventilation (CDV) and microjet ventilation (MJV). Vertical temperature stratification was strongest in CDV, leading to losses in the comfort of the lower body parts. In MJV, some temporary and local exceedances of air velocities were observed, which contributed to lower comfort evaluations at heads and shoulders. For all ventilation settings, warmer air temperatures were preferred. Our findings demonstrated that subjective comfort assessments reasonably complement earlier results derived from thermal manikin studies. Therefore, low-momentum ventilation, especially in terms of HV, has the significant potential to improve thermal conditions for long-distance journeys in passenger rail cars.
Key Findings
1
Across all ventilation settings, subjects preferred warmer air temperatures, and subjective assessments complemented prior thermal manikin study results indicating HV has significant potential to improve long-distance passenger rail thermal conditions.
2
Cabin displacement ventilation (CDV) caused the strongest vertical temperature stratification, reducing comfort of lower body parts.
3
Hatrack integrated low-momentum ventilation and hybrid ventilation (HV) yielded comparatively higher subjective thermal comfort than cabin displacement ventilation (CDV) and microjet ventilation (MJV).
4
Microjet ventilation (MJV) produced temporary and local air-velocity exceedances at head and shoulder level, lowering comfort in those regions.
5
Three novel low-momentum ventilation concepts (hatrack integrated, hybrid ventilation, cabin displacement ventilation, microjet ventilation) produced significantly different perceived thermal comfort compared to conventional ventilation.
Research Object
Novel low-momentum ventilation concepts for passengers in long-distance train compartments (hatrack integrated low-momentum ventilation, hybrid ventilation, cabin displacement ventilation, microjet ventilation)
Research Subject
Thermal comfort of railway passengers in a generic train compartment under different low-momentum ventilation settings, including perceived comfort, vertical temperature stratification, local air velocity effects, and preference for warmer air temperatures
Publication Details
Publication Date
2023-03-13
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
6
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest