Civic Engagement and Democracy in Post-Suharto Indonesia: A Review of Musrenbang, the Kecamatan Development Programme, and Labour Organising
Гражданская вовлечённость и демократия в Индонезии после Сухарто: обзор Musrenbang, Программы развития кекаматанов и организации трудящихся
2017-06-08
SCID: 54.1/d678ek2d
Discuss with AI
Bottom-up mobilisationCivic engagementDemocratic consolidationLabour organisingMusrenbang
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Drawing attention to the wider literature on the linkages between civic engagement and democracy, this paper starts off by asking the question whether civic engagement beyond formal politics actually serves to strengthen democracy in Indonesia. Noting a contradiction between the literature that proposes that high associational density fosters democracy and recent analysis that highlights that political opportunity structures in Indonesia are unfavourable to popular representation and participation, the paper draws attention to a largely underexplored field within Indonesian democracy studies, namely that of mobilisation and participation by marginalised groups. The paper discusses and analyses strategies for bottom-up mobilisation, specifically the development planning programmes of Musrenbang, the Kecamatan Development Programme (KDP), and Indonesian labour organising. The analysis focuses on the democratising aspects of these sectors, arguing that participation and mobilisation lacks the necessary popular foundations as well as organisational capacities that are necessary for participatory institutions to effectively enhance democracy. The paper thereby hints that associational density in and of itself is a poor indicator for democracy, especially in relation to democratic consolidation in new democracies.
Key Findings
1
Analysis of Musrenbang, the Kecamatan Development Programme, and labour organising shows that marginalised-group mobilisation has limited democratising effects.
2
Associational density alone is a poor indicator of democratic consolidation in new democracies, including Indonesia.
3
It identifies a tension between theories linking dense associations to democracy and Indonesia’s political structures, which restrict popular representation and participation.
4
Participatory institutions lack sufficient popular foundations and organisational capacities to translate participation and mobilisation into stronger democracy.
5
The paper examines whether civic engagement beyond formal politics strengthens democracy in post-Suharto Indonesia.
Research Object
Bottom-up civic mobilisation and participation in Indonesia, specifically Musrenbang, the Kecamatan Development Programme (KDP), and Indonesian labour organising
Research Subject
The democratising effects and limitations of participation, mobilisation, popular foundations, and organisational capacities in these sectors
Publication Details
Publication Date
2017-06-08
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest