Civic Engagement and Democracy in Post-Suharto Indonesia: A Review of Musrenbang, the Kecamatan Development Programme, and Labour Organising

Гражданская вовлечённость и демократия в Индонезии после Сухарто: обзор Musrenbang, Программы развития кекаматанов и организации трудящихся
Gyda Marås Sindre
2017-06-08

Bottom-up mobilisationCivic engagementDemocratic consolidationLabour organisingMusrenbang
Drawing attention to the wider literature on the linkages between civic engagement and democracy, this paper starts off by asking the question whether civic engagement beyond formal politics actually serves to strengthen democracy in Indonesia. Noting a contradiction between the literature that proposes that high associational density fosters democracy and recent analysis that highlights that political opportunity structures in Indonesia are unfavourable to popular representation and participation, the paper draws attention to a largely underexplored field within Indonesian democracy studies, namely that of mobilisation and participation by marginalised groups. The paper discusses and analyses strategies for bottom-up mobilisation, specifically the development planning programmes of Musrenbang, the Kecamatan Development Programme (KDP), and Indonesian labour organising. The analysis focuses on the democratising aspects of these sectors, arguing that participation and mobilisation lacks the necessary popular foundations as well as organisational capacities that are necessary for participatory institutions to effectively enhance democracy. The paper thereby hints that associational density in and of itself is a poor indicator for democracy, especially in relation to democratic consolidation in new democracies.
1
Analysis of Musrenbang, the Kecamatan Development Programme, and labour organising shows that marginalised-group mobilisation has limited democratising effects.
2
Associational density alone is a poor indicator of democratic consolidation in new democracies, including Indonesia.
3
It identifies a tension between theories linking dense associations to democracy and Indonesia’s political structures, which restrict popular representation and participation.
4
Participatory institutions lack sufficient popular foundations and organisational capacities to translate participation and mobilisation into stronger democracy.
5
The paper examines whether civic engagement beyond formal politics strengthens democracy in post-Suharto Indonesia.

Bottom-up civic mobilisation and participation in Indonesia, specifically Musrenbang, the Kecamatan Development Programme (KDP), and Indonesian labour organising

The democratising effects and limitations of participation, mobilisation, popular foundations, and organisational capacities in these sectors

Publication Details
Publication Date
2017-06-08
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Gyda Marås Sindre
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%