Gill Health in Fish Farmed in Recirculating Aquaculture Systems (<scp>RAS</scp>): A Review
Состояние жабр у рыб, выращиваемых в системах рециркуляции воды (RAS): обзор
2024-12-09
SCID: 54.1/dcutdb8c
Discuss with AI
Recirculating Aquaculture Systems (RAS)gill healthgill histologygill microbiomewater quality
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Recirculating Aquaculture Systems (RAS) have been proposed as the future of aquaculture, because they can be used anywhere regardless of access to water, they offer high level of control over farming environment, including biosecurity, and are considered to be sustainable. However, despite of continuous development, there can be still issues with water quality affecting gill health of fish farmed in these systems. This review provides an overview of fish gill structure and gill immune response, and discusses the known impacts of RAS on gill health. Several experimental studies have inadequately reported conditions, particularly water quality, making it difficult to determine if the observed effects were due to water quality issues or RAS system itself. It is crucial for studies investigating the impact of RAS on fish to report water quality during the study. Furthermore, assessments of RAS effects on gill health should include sufficient independent replicates and flow through controls using a common water source. Various methods have been used to assess gill health in RAS, including gill histology, presence of pathogens, gene expression in the gills and gill microbiome analysis. Differences in gill health in fish from RAS and a flow through system have been shown for a number of freshwater and marine fish species. However, these results have been inconsistent across studies, and some results have been challenging to interpret as indicators of gill health. Holistic studies including a number of different methods to assess fish gills would give more conclusive results. More research is needed, in particular, on brackish and marine RAS, to fully understand their impacts on gill health.
Key Findings
1
Differences in gill health between RAS and flow-through systems have been observed for several freshwater and marine species, but findings are inconsistent and sometimes hard to interpret.
2
Holistic studies combining multiple assessment methods are needed to produce more conclusive evaluations of gill health in RAS.
3
Many experimental studies inadequately report water quality conditions, preventing determination whether gill effects are due to water quality or RAS design itself.
4
More research is specifically needed on brackish and marine RAS to fully understand their impacts on fish gill health.
5
Multiple assessment methods (gill histology, pathogen detection, gill gene expression, gill microbiome analysis) have been applied, but results across methods and studies are inconsistent.
6
RAS offer environmental control, biosecurity, and sustainability advantages, but water quality issues in RAS can still negatively affect fish gill health.
7
Studies assessing RAS impacts on gill health should include sufficient independent replicates and flow-through controls using a common water source.
Research Object
Gill health of fish farmed in Recirculating Aquaculture Systems (RAS)
Research Subject
Impacts of RAS on gill structure, immune response, pathology and associated indicators (histology, pathogens, gene expression, microbiome) and how water quality and experimental design influence assessment of gill health
Publication Details
Publication Date
2024-12-09
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
9
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest