Living Things Are Not (20th Century) Machines: Updating Mechanism Metaphors in Light of the Modern Science of Machine Behavior

Живые организмы — не (машины XX века): обновление механистических метафор в свете современной науки о поведении машин
Joshua Bongard, Michael Levin
2021-03-16

Machine Behaviorartificial lifeevolved and designed systemsmachine learningsynthetic bioengineering
One of the most useful metaphors for driving scientific and engineering progress has been that of the “machine.” Much controversy exists about the applicability of this concept in the life sciences. Advances in molecular biology have revealed numerous design principles that can be harnessed to understand cells from an engineering perspective, and build novel devices to rationally exploit the laws of chemistry, physics, and computation. At the same time, organicists point to the many unique features of life, especially at larger scales of organization, which have resisted decomposition analysis and artificial implementation. Here, we argue that much of this debate has focused on inessential aspects of machines – classical properties which have been surpassed by advances in modern Machine Behavior and no longer apply. This emerging multidisciplinary field, at the interface of artificial life, machine learning, and synthetic bioengineering, is highlighting the inadequacy of existing definitions. Key terms such as machine, robot, program, software, evolved, designed, etc., need to be revised in light of technological and theoretical advances that have moved past the dated philosophical conceptions that have limited our understanding of both evolved and designed systems. Moving beyond contingent aspects of historical and current machines will enable conceptual tools that embrace inevitable advances in synthetic and hybrid bioengineering and computer science, toward a framework that identifies essential distinctions between fundamental concepts of devices and living agents. Progress in both theory and practical applications requires the establishment of a novel conception of “machines as they could be,” based on the profound lessons of biology at all scales. We sketch a perspective that acknowledges the remarkable, unique aspects of life to help re-define key terms, and identify deep, essential features of concepts for a future in which sharp boundaries between evolved and designed systems will not exist.
1
A revised conception of machines should incorporate biological principles across organizational scales while distinguishing essential features of devices and living agents.
2
Advances in artificial life, machine learning, and synthetic bioengineering challenge existing definitions of machine, robot, program, software, evolution, and design.
3
The paper argues that classical machine metaphors inadequately describe living systems because they emphasize outdated properties surpassed by modern Machine Behavior.
4
The proposed framework anticipates diminishing boundaries between evolved and designed systems and describes machines in terms of what they could become.
5
Updating these concepts is necessary for theoretical progress and practical applications involving future synthetic and hybrid bioengineering systems.

Machine metaphors and concepts applied to living, evolved, designed, synthetic, and hybrid biological systems

Revising the definitions and essential distinctions of machines, robots, programs, software, evolution, and design in light of modern Machine Behavior and the distinctive multiscale properties of life

Publication Details
Publication Date
2021-03-16
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
115
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Joshua Bongard
Michael Levin
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%