Information, Commitment, and the Russo-Japanese War of 1904-1905
Информация, приверженность и Русско‑японская война 1904–1905 годов
2014-05-01
SCID: 54.1/dhr5exrm
Discuss with AI
Russo-Japanese War 1904–1905bargaining model of warcommitment probleminformational asymmetriespreventive war logic
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
We apply a modified version of the bargaining model of war to the outbreak of the Russo-Japanese War of 1904–1905. We conceptualize the informational path to war as a two-step process, the first identifying the sources of informational asymmetries, and the second specifying the causal linkages between informational asymmetries and war. The sources of informational asymmetries include not only private information and incentives to misrepresent that information, but also individual, societal, and governmental-level factors. We argue that the primary causes of the Russo-Japanese War involved a combination of the commitment problem and preventive logic arising from Russia's growing power relative to that of Japan, and informational problems arising from disagreements about relative power and resolve. These disagreements arose almost exclusively from Russian political and military leaders' underestimation of Japanese capabilities and resolve, and they generated highly intransigent Russian bargaining behavior. Russia misperceptions can be traced primarily to racial and cultural stereotypes and psychological biases, and to competition between rival domestic and bureaucratic factions that distorted information flows, created an incoherent decision-making process, and sent confusing signals to Japan.
Key Findings
1
Distorted information flows and incoherent Russian decision-making sent confusing signals to Japan, contributing causally to the outbreak of war.
2
Primary causes of the war combined a commitment problem and preventive logic from Russia's rising power relative to Japan with informational disagreements about relative power and resolve.
3
Russian misperceptions stemmed mainly from racial and cultural stereotypes, psychological biases, and competition among domestic and bureaucratic factions that distorted information and decision-making.
4
Russian political and military leaders almost exclusively underestimated Japanese capabilities and resolve, producing highly intransigent Russian bargaining behavior.
5
The paper models the Russo-Japanese War (1904–1905) using a modified bargaining model that treats the informational path to war as a two-step process.
Research Object
The Russo-Japanese War of 1904–1905 (the dyadic conflict between Imperial Russia and Meiji Japan)
Research Subject
How informational asymmetries and commitment problems—specifically misperceptions of relative power and resolve driven by private incentives, stereotypes, biases, and domestic factional competition—caused/influenced the outbreak and intransigent bargaining leading to the war
Publication Details
Publication Date
2014-05-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest