Evaluation of Eagle Ford Cyclic Gas Injection EOR: Field Results and Economics

Оценка циклической закачки газа для повышения нефтеотдачи в Eagle Ford: полевые результаты и экономика
George Grinestaff, Chris Barden, J. F. Miller, W. S. Franklin, Christopher Barden, Eric Ding
2020-08-13

Cyclic Gas Injection EOREUR increaseEagle Fordcompositional simulationcompressor utilization
Abstract Eagle Ford Cyclic Gas Injection EOR (CGEOR) was started in late 2012, by EOG Resources, and has expanded to over 30 leases by 6 operators (266 wells) to date where produced gas is being injected. An extensive EOR evaluation was initiated by Shale IOR to understand results for these leases. This paper will provide a summary of EOR production evaluation results, pilot history match, and economics for two Eagle Ford projects through June 2019. All production, injection volumes, and other data were obtained from the Texas Railroad Commission. These pilots and commercial projects represent a range of outcomes. We evaluate base decline EUR and incremental IOR oil production. Detailed compositional simulation is used to understand process PVT phase behavior and make accurate well and unit production profiles which guide our understanding of field results. We explain the process to predict project profiles and generate rigorous cash flows to understand economic drivers. Results of this study show that CGEOR throughout the Eagle Ford volatile oil can yield an additional 30% to 90% increase in EUR with robust economics, depending on compressor utilization and field life. The CGEOR process appears to be working without any failures thus far in the Eagle Ford, however, phase behavior must be understood along with operational efficiency in order to achieve good economics. Eagle Ford field results show that compressor and well operations are key to production efficiency as oil production closely follows gas injection volumes. These results should also be helpful to build upon knowledge in other unconventional basins.
1
Analysis of two Eagle Ford projects through June 2019 used Texas Railroad Commission production and injection data plus compositional simulation and history matching.
2
CGEOR in Eagle Ford volatile oil can increase estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) by 30% to 90%, depending on compressor utilization and field life.
3
CGEOR projects in Eagle Ford show robust economics when operational efficiency and compressor utilization are appropriate.
4
Cyclic Gas Injection EOR (CGEOR) implemented in Eagle Ford since late 2012 expanded to over 30 leases and 266 wells across 6 operators.
5
No CGEOR failures observed in the Eagle Ford to date, but understanding phase behavior and operational efficiency is necessary for good economics.
6
Oil production closely follows gas injection volumes, indicating compressor and well operations are key to production efficiency.
7
Study methods include predicting project production profiles and generating rigorous cash flows to identify economic drivers.

Eagle Ford cyclic gas injection enhanced oil recovery (CGEOR) pilots and commercial projects (leases/wells) where produced gas is injected

Evaluation of EOR performance and economics including incremental oil production (EUR increase), base-decline EUR, production vs injection relationship, compositional phase behavior, pilot history matching, and cash-flow economic drivers

Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-08-13
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
George Grinestaff
Chris Barden
J. F. Miller
W. S. Franklin
Christopher Barden
Eric Ding
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%