Publishing in premier journals with high impact factor and <scp>Q1</scp> journals: Dos and <scp>Don'ts</scp>
Публикация в ведущих журналах с высоким импакт-фактором и журналах категории Q1: что следует и чего не следует делать
2024-04-22
SCID: 54.1/djxyzkuc
Discuss with AI
Q1 journalshigh impact factormanuscript rejectionpremier journalspublication strategies
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Abstract The evolving landscape of the academic world has ushered in a plethora of challenges and opportunities for researchers. While there are undoubtedly monetary incentives and fringe benefits for those who actively engage in publishing, the journey toward acceptance by a premier journal is often arduous and time‐consuming. Considering this context, this paper endeavors to dissect prevailing trends, elucidate the reasons behind manuscript rejections, and furnish a compendium of strategies and insights aimed at augmenting the likelihood of acceptance while mitigating the probability of rejection.
Key Findings
1
It analyzes common reasons manuscripts are rejected by high-impact and Q1 journals.
2
It compiles practical strategies and insights intended to increase manuscript acceptance probability and reduce rejection risk.
3
The paper examines current academic publishing trends and the challenges of securing acceptance in premier and Q1 journals.
4
The paper frames publishing success as a demanding, time-consuming process despite monetary incentives and other benefits associated with publication.
Research Object
Manuscript submission and publication in premier high-impact-factor and Q1 journals
Research Subject
Publication trends, reasons for manuscript rejection, and strategies for increasing acceptance likelihood and reducing rejection risk
Publication Details
Publication Date
2024-04-22
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
106
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest
References available in scid.ai4
Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy2023
CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting2021
Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR‐4‐SLR)2021
Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance2007