An Economic Theory of Democracy.

Экономическая теория демократии
Edward C. Banfield, Anthony J. Downs
1958-08-01

Downs theoryRiker and Ordeshook 1968rational calculus of votingrational voter paradoxvoter turnout
Downs presents a rational calculus of voting that has inspired much of the later work on voting and turnout. Particularly significant was his conclusion that a rational voter should almost never bother to vote. This conclusion, especially as elaborated on by Riker and Ordeshook (1968) has shifted the attention of modern political scientists from explaining why people don't vote to explaining why they do.
1
A central conclusion is that a rational voter should almost never bother to vote.
2
Downs formulates a rational calculus of voting that frames voting decisions as utility-maximizing choices.
3
Riker and Ordeshook (1968) elaborated Downs's conclusion, reinforcing its influence on subsequent theories of turnout.
4
This paradoxical conclusion redirected political science research focus from explaining non-voting to explaining why people do vote.

Democratic voting behavior in electorates (voters' decision to vote or abstain)

Rational calculus of voting predicting low turnout, i.e., the decision-making mechanism and incentives leading a rational voter to rarely vote

Publication Details
Publication Date
1958-08-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Edward C. Banfield
Anthony J. Downs
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%