A reconstruction of development of the periodic table based on history and philosophy of science and its implications for general chemistry textbooks
Реконструкция развития периодической таблицы на основе истории и философии науки и ее значение для учебников общей химии
2004-11-30
SCID: 54.1/dksvy4xw
Discuss with AI
Mendeleev's contributiongeneral chemistry textbookshistory and philosophy of scienceinductive generalizationperiodic table development
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
The objectives of this study are: (a) elaboration of a history and philosophy of science (HPS) framework based on a reconstruction of the development of the periodic table; (b) formulation of seven criteria based on the framework; and (c) evaluation of 57 freshman college-level general chemistry textbooks with respect to the presentation of the periodic table. The historical reconstruction of the periodic table showed that the periodicity of the elements could be construed as an inductive generalization or as a function of the atomic theory. There is considerable controversy with respect to the nature of Mendeleev's contribution, and various alternatives are discussed: ordered domain; empirical law; and a theory with limited explanatory power. Accommodation of the elements according to their physicochemical properties is considered to be the major contribution of the periodic table by all textbooks, followed by contrapredictions of previously unknown elements (30 textbooks), and novel predictions (corrections of atomic mass) of known elements (10 textbooks). The relative importance of accommodation and prediction within an HPS framework is generally ignored. Few textbooks have attempted to explore the possible cause of periodicity in the table and very few textbooks have explored the nature of Mendeleev's contribution. The development of the periodic table as a sequence of heuristic principles in the form of a convincing argument has been ignored. The textbook approach of emphasizing that the development of the periodic table was an inductive generalization, and that Mendeleev had no model or theory, does not facilitate the spirit of critical inquiry that led the scientists to grapple with alternative interpretations, conflicts, and controversies. It is concluded that the development of the periodic table went through a continual critical appraisal (conflict and controversy), in which scientists presented various tentative theoretical ideas to understand the observed phenomena. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 42: 84–111, 2005
Key Findings
1
All 57 analyzed textbooks emphasize accommodating elements by physicochemical properties; 30 discuss predictions of previously unknown elements, while 10 discuss corrections to atomic masses of known elements.
2
Historical reconstruction indicates that periodicity can be interpreted either as an inductive generalization or as a consequence of atomic theory.
3
Mendeleev’s contribution is contested and may be characterized as establishing an ordered domain, an empirical law, or a theory with limited explanatory power.
4
Most textbooks neglect the relative roles of accommodation and prediction, the possible cause of periodicity, Mendeleev’s contribution, and the development process as a sequence of critically evaluated heuristic principles.
5
The study develops a history-and-philosophy-of-science framework for reconstructing the periodic table’s development and derives seven evaluation criteria.
Research Object
The development and textbook presentation of the periodic table of the elements
Research Subject
The historical and philosophical interpretation of the periodic table’s development, including the roles of periodicity, accommodation, prediction, and Mendeleev’s contribution in general chemistry textbooks
Publication Details
Publication Date
2004-11-30
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest