A structural-chemical explanation of fungal laccase activity

Структурно-химическое объяснение активности грибных лакказ
Anne S. Meyer, Kasper P. Kepp, Jan Muschiol, Rukmankesh Mehra
2018-11-19

MMGBSA binding affinityQSAR modelingfungal laccasesmulti-copper oxidasesphenolic substrates
Abstract Fungal laccases (EC 1.10.3.2) are multi-copper oxidases that oxidize a wide variety of substrates. Despite extensive studies, the molecular basis for their diverse activity is unclear. Notably, there is no current way to rationally predict the activity of a laccase toward a given substrate. Such knowledge would greatly facilitate the rational design of new laccases for technological purposes. We report a study of three datasets of experimental Km values and activities for Trametes versicolor and Cerrena unicolor laccase, using a range of protein modeling techniques. We identify diverse binding modes of the various substrates and confirm an important role of Asp-206 and His-458 (T. versicolor laccase numbering) in guiding substrate recognition. Importantly, we demonstrate that experimental Km values correlate with binding affinities computed by MMGBSA. This confirms the common assumption that the protein-substrate affinity is a major contributor to observed Km. From quantitative structure-activity relations (QSAR) we identify physicochemical properties that correlate with observed Km and activities. In particular, the ionization potential, shape, and binding affinity of the substrate largely determine the enzyme’s Km for the particular substrate. Our results suggest that Km is not just a binding constant but also contains features of the enzymatic activity. In addition, we identify QSAR models with only a few descriptors showing that phenolic substrates employ optimal hydrophobic packing to reach the T1 site, but then require additional electronic properties to engage in the subsequent electron transfer. Our results advance our ability to model laccase activity and lend promise to future rational optimization of laccases toward phenolic substrates.
1
Experimental Km values correlated with MMGBSA-computed binding affinities, supporting protein–substrate affinity as a major contributor to observed Km.
2
Km reflects not only binding strength but also features of enzymatic activity, including processes beyond initial substrate association.
3
Phenolic substrates require optimal hydrophobic packing to reach the T1 site and additional electronic properties to support subsequent electron transfer.
4
Protein modeling revealed diverse substrate-binding modes and confirmed Asp-206 and His-458 as important determinants of substrate recognition in fungal laccases.
5
QSAR analysis identified substrate ionization potential, molecular shape, and binding affinity as major determinants of laccase Km and activity.

Fungal laccases from Trametes versicolor and Cerrena unicolor acting on diverse, particularly phenolic, substrates

The structural and physicochemical determinants of substrate recognition, binding affinity, Km, and enzymatic activity, including the roles of Asp-206 and His-458 and electron-transfer requirements

Publication Details
Publication Date
2018-11-19
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Anne S. Meyer
Kasper P. Kepp
Jan Muschiol
Rukmankesh Mehra
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%