Between Diplomacy and Sportswashing: How the Media Frame Esports’ Soft Power

Между дипломатией и «спортивной отмывкой»: как СМИ формируют представление о мягкой силе киберспорта
K. H. Kim, Sadman Sakib
2026-02-24

content analysiscross-country framingesports soft powermedia framingsportswashing
Recent theorising in esports suggests it serves as a viable strategy for building soft power and achieving diplomatic outcomes, but concerns about sportswashing have also emerged in the news media. In this context, the current study examines how the media frame esports’ soft power potential and how framing varies across countries. First, a qualitative framing analysis of newspaper articles identified dominant frames; then a quantitative content analysis examined the differences in framing. The findings suggest that in China, Saudi Arabia, South Korea and the USA, news media present esports as a viable form of sports entertainment with significant cultural and economic impact. In China, Saudi Arabia and South Korea, esports is often portrayed as a major sport, with government bodies and industry stakeholders collaborating to foster cross-cultural exchanges. By contrast, US coverage rarely frames esports as a government-led initiative. Instead, it tends to highlight uncertainties in the esports ecosystem, such as investment risks, potential sportswashing and government influence over esports management, compared with coverage in China, Saudi Arabia or South Korea. These results contribute to our understanding of how esports’ soft power is constructed and perceived.
1
Framing of esports’ soft power varies across countries, shaping how esports’ soft power is constructed and perceived internationally.
2
In China, Saudi Arabia and South Korea, esports is frequently framed as a major sport with government bodies and industry stakeholders collaborating to foster cross-cultural exchanges.
3
News media in China, Saudi Arabia, South Korea and the USA present esports as a viable form of sports entertainment with significant cultural and economic impact.
4
US coverage highlights concerns such as investment risks, potential sportswashing, and government influence over esports management more than coverage in China, Saudi Arabia, or South Korea.
5
US media coverage rarely frames esports as a government-led initiative and instead emphasizes uncertainties in the esports ecosystem.

News media coverage of esports' soft power across China, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, and the USA

How news media frame esports' soft power potential and how these frames vary cross-nationally, including emphases on sportswashing, government involvement, cultural and economic impacts, and perceived uncertainties

Publication Details
Publication Date
2026-02-24
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
0
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
K. H. Kim
Sadman Sakib
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%