epiTCR: a highly sensitive predictor for TCR–peptide binding
epiTCR: высокочувствительный предиктор связывания TCR с пептидами
2023-04-24
SCID: 54.1/dvxp56h3
Discuss with AI
BLOSUM62 encodingRandom ForestTCR CDR3β sequencesTCR–peptide bindingneoantigen prediction
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
MOTIVATION: Predicting the binding between T-cell receptor (TCR) and peptide presented by human leucocyte antigen molecule is a highly challenging task and a key bottleneck in the development of immunotherapy. Existing prediction tools, despite exhibiting good performance on the datasets they were built with, suffer from low true positive rates when used to predict epitopes capable of eliciting T-cell responses in patients. Therefore, an improved tool for TCR-peptide prediction built upon a large dataset combining existing publicly available data is still needed. RESULTS: We collected data from five public databases (IEDB, TBAdb, VDJdb, McPAS-TCR, and 10X) to form a dataset of >3 million TCR-peptide pairs, 3.27% of which were binding interactions. We proposed epiTCR, a Random Forest-based method dedicated to predicting the TCR-peptide interactions. epiTCR used simple input of TCR CDR3β sequences and antigen sequences, which are encoded by flattened BLOSUM62. epiTCR performed with area under the curve (0.98) and higher sensitivity (0.94) than other existing tools (NetTCR, Imrex, ATM-TCR, and pMTnet), while maintaining comparable prediction specificity (0.9). We identified seven epitopes that contributed to 98.67% of false positives predicted by epiTCR and exerted similar effects on other tools. We also demonstrated a considerable influence of peptide sequences on prediction, highlighting the need for more diverse peptides in a more balanced dataset. In conclusion, epiTCR is among the most well-performing tools, thanks to the use of combined data from public sources and its use will contribute to the quest in identifying neoantigens for precision cancer immunotherapy. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: epiTCR is available on GitHub (https://github.com/ddiem-ri-4D/epiTCR).
Key Findings
1
A dataset combining five public databases contains over 3 million TCR–peptide pairs, with 3.27% representing binding interactions.
2
Peptide sequence composition strongly influenced prediction performance, emphasizing the need for more diverse peptides and balanced datasets.
3
Seven epitopes accounted for 98.67% of epiTCR’s false positives and produced similar effects across other prediction tools.
4
The method maintained comparable prediction specificity of 0.90 relative to existing tools.
5
epiTCR achieved an area under the curve of 0.98 and sensitivity of 0.94, outperforming NetTCR, Imrex, ATM-TCR, and pMTnet in sensitivity.
6
epiTCR predicts TCR–peptide binding using a Random Forest model based on CDR3β and antigen sequences encoded with flattened BLOSUM62.
Research Object
TCR–peptide binding interactions, represented by TCR CDR3β and antigen peptide sequences
Research Subject
Prediction performance and sequence-dependent determinants of TCR–peptide binding, particularly sensitivity, specificity, and false-positive behavior
Publication Details
Publication Date
2023-04-24
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
68
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest