Coronavirus mapping in scientific publications: When science advances rapidly and collectively, is access to this knowledge open to society?

Картирование коронавируса в научных публикациях: если наука развивается быстро и коллективно, открыт ли обществу доступ к этим знаниям?
Simone Belli, Rogério Mugnaini, Joan Baltà, Ernest Abadal
2020-07-01

COVID-19 bibliometric mappingVOSviewer network analysisWeb of Scienceinternational scientific collaborationopen access publications
The COVID-19 pandemic is creating a global health emergency. Mapping this health emergency in scientific publications demands multiple approaches to obtain a picture as complete as possible. To progress in the knowledge of this pandemic and to control its effects, international collaborations between researchers are essentials, as well as having open and immediate access to scientific publications, what we called "coopetition". Our main objectives are to identify the most productive countries in coronavirus publications, to analyse the international scientific collaboration on this topic, and to study the proportion and typology of open accessibility to these publications. We have analyzed 18,875 articles indexed in Web of Science. We performed the descriptive statistical analysis in order to explore the performance of the more prolific countries and organizations, as well as paying attention to the last 2 years. Registers have been analyzed separately via the VOSviewer software, drawing a network of links among countries and organizations to identify the starred countries and organizations, and the strongest links of the net. We have explored the capacity of researchers to generate scientific knowledge about a health crisis emergency, and their global capacity to collaborate among them in a global emergency. We consider that science is moving rapidly to find solutions to international health problems but access to this knowledge by society is not so quick due to several limitations (open access policies, corporate interests, etc.). We have observed that papers from China in the last 3 months (from January 2020 to March 2020) have a strong impact compared with papers published in years before. The United States and China are the major producers of documents of our sample, followed by all European countries, especially the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands, and France. At the same time, the leading role of Saudi Arabia, Canada or South Korea should be noted, with a significant number of documents submitted but very different dynamics of international collaboration. The proportion of international collaboration is growing in all countries in 2019-2020, which contrasts with the situation of the last two decades. The organizations providing the most documents to the sample are mostly Chinese. The percentage of open access articles on coronavirus for the period 2001-2020 is 59.2% but if we focus in 2020 the figures increase up to 91.4%, due to the commitment of commercial publishers with the emergency.
1
Chinese coronavirus papers published from January to March 2020 had a strong impact compared with Chinese papers published in earlier years.
2
International collaboration increased across all countries in 2019–2020, contrasting with collaboration patterns observed during the preceding two decades.
3
Open-access availability rose from 59.2% for 2001–2020 publications to 91.4% for publications in 2020, largely because commercial publishers responded to the emergency.
4
The United States and China are the largest producers of coronavirus publications, followed by European countries, particularly the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands, and France.
5
The study analyzes 18,875 coronavirus-related articles indexed in Web of Science using statistical analysis and VOSviewer collaboration networks.

Scientific publications on coronaviruses and the COVID-19 pandemic

Publication productivity, international research collaboration, and the proportion and typology of open access to coronavirus research

Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-07-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Simone Belli
Rogério Mugnaini
Joan Baltà
Ernest Abadal
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%