eerieobject resistancephenomenologyrepulsion and attractionsubject-object formation
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
In this paper, we explore what it means for an object to be eerie. We argue that the Eerie is an index of phenomenology’s limits: it is a complex, contradictory moment in the dialectics of subject/object formation. If the familiar story of phenomenology correlates the contours of objects along transcendental vectors of subjective experience, the de-formations of eeriness emerge as the object’s resistance to our assimilation of it. An object’s eeriness is its pulling away from the pall of familiarity the subject throws over the object-world; even as the eerie object recedes from us, that very recession re-establishes it as part of a material, object field, no longer fully correlated to the subject. Yet as disturbing as eerie objects are, we also seek them out; they are compelling in their strangeness. As such, we develop a view of the Eerie which involves conflicted polarities of experience: repulsion and attraction.
Key Findings
1
An eerie object’s withdrawal from subjective correlation re-establishes it as part of an independent material field.
2
Eerie objects generate conflicted experience: they are simultaneously disturbing and compelling, producing repulsion and attraction.
3
Eeriness emerges when an object resists the subject’s assimilation and familiarizing interpretation of the object-world.
4
The Eerie marks phenomenology’s limits by revealing a contradictory moment in the formation of subjects and objects.
Research Object
eerie objects and their formation in the subject/object relation
Research Subject
the phenomenological dynamics of eeriness, including an object's resistance to subjective assimilation and the resulting tension between repulsion and attraction
Publication Details
Publication Date
2022-09-03
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
3
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest