EOR Field Experiences in Carbonate Reservoirs in the United States

Полевой опыт применения методов увеличения нефтеотдачи в карбонатных коллекторах США
Eduardo Manrique, Mariano Gurfinkel, Viviana Eugenia Muci
2007-12-01

CO2 floodingcarbonate reservoirsenhanced oil recoverygeologic carbon storagewater-alternating gas
Summary A considerable portion of the world's hydrocarbon endowment is in carbonate reservoirs. Carbonate reservoirs usually exhibit low porosity and may be fractured. These two characteristics along with oil-to-mixed wet rock properties usually result in lowered hydrocarbon recovery rates. When enhanced oil recovery (EOR) strategies are pursued, the injected fluids will likely flow through the fracture network and bypass the oil in the rock matrix. The high permeability in the fracture network and the low equivalent porous volume result in early breakthrough of the injected fluids. Infill drilling programs and well conformance strategies—mostly gas and water shutoff—have been effectively used to mitigate the early breakthrough and increase oil recovery. In most cases, however, 40 to 50% of the original oil in place (OOIP) is not produced. A large number of EOR field projects in carbonate reservoirs have been referenced in the literature since the early 1970s. These field projects demonstrate the technical feasibility of various EOR methods in carbonate reservoirs. However, because of the collapse in oil prices, most of the aforementioned project plans have been abandoned. This paper presents a comprehensive compilation of EOR (Gas, Chemical, and Thermal methods) field experiences in carbonate reservoirs within the US, as an attempt to identify key variables and project design parameters for future evaluation and revitalization of mature carbonate reservoirs. Carbon dioxide flooding [continuous or water-alternating gas (WAG)] is the dominant EOR process used in the US This is because of the high availability of low-cost CO2. CO2 EOR in particular represents the logical first step towards viable geologic carbon storage and sequestration. EOR chemical methods in carbonate reservoirs, especially polymer flooding, have been widely tested in US carbonate reservoirs. However, EOR chemical methods have made a marginal contribution, relatively, in terms of total oil recovered. Our study includes a brief overview of current laboratory (e.g. wettability changes and novel chemical additives) and field (e.g. injectivity enhancement) experiences in EOR chemical methods in carbonate formations. A brief discussion surrounding the screening methods used to identify viable EOR opportunities in carbonate fields based on past and present experiences is also included. Introduction Carbonate reservoirs are naturally-fractured geologic formations characterized by heterogeneous porosity and permeability distributions. In the case of low porosity and low permeability carbonate rocks (more specifically rock matrices), the fluid flow in the reservoir can be completely dependent on the fracture network while the matrix only plays a source role (analogous to tight sand formations and natural gas flow). In the case of porous carbonate rocks, fracture networks can cause uneven sweeping of the reservoir, leading to early breakthrough of injected fluids in the producing wells and resulting in low recovery factors. The abundance of carbonate reservoirs has been the subject of numerous studies attempting to characterize their heterogeneities, classify different types of fractured reservoirs, and determine how rock and fluid properties have an impact on ultimate recovery (Roehl et al. 1985; Allan and Qing Sun 2003; Carr et al. 2001; Grave et al. 2000; Benson et al. 1998; Wardlaw 1996). The TORIS database (maintained by the US Department of Energy) indicates 22% of the OOIP in the US is contained in shallow-shelf carbonate reservoirs. Currently in the US, these types of reservoirs exist in more than 14 states with over 70% of the OOIP located in reservoirs in Texas and New Mexico, mostly concentrated in the Permian Basin (Nuckols 1992, Xie et al. 2005). Over the last three decades, primary production, waterflooding, and CO2 floods, combined with infill drilling programs, have been the most widely used recovery methods. However, other EOR strategies have been tested in the past and there are currently several active research programs seeking alternatives to increase the recovery factor of these mostly light crude-oil reservoirs economically. Although the Permian Basin (west Texas and southeast New Mexico) can be considered mature, its potential for improved oil recovery is still very high. A recent study reports that there is an estimated 30 billion barrels of mobile oil in the Permian Basin, reiterating the strategic importance of EOR technologies for carbonate reservoirs and their impact on US oil production (Nuckols 1992; Xie et al. 2005; Seethepalli et al. 2004; Moritis 2004; Cole 2003; Moritis 2003; Dutton et al. 2004).
1
CO2 flooding, including continuous injection and WAG, is the dominant US carbonate EOR method due to low-cost CO2 availability and its potential linkage to geologic carbon storage.
2
Carbonate reservoirs commonly have low porosity, fractures, and mixed-wet conditions that reduce hydrocarbon recovery and promote unfavorable fluid flow.
3
Chemical EOR, especially polymer flooding, has been widely tested in US carbonate reservoirs but has made only a marginal contribution to total oil recovery.
4
Infill drilling and well-conformance measures, particularly gas and water shutoff, can mitigate early breakthrough and increase oil recovery; nevertheless, 40–50% of OOIP commonly remains unrecovered.
5
Injected EOR fluids often preferentially enter high-permeability fractures, bypass the oil-filled matrix, and break through early because of limited equivalent porous volume.
6
US carbonate-reservoir field projects demonstrate the technical feasibility of gas, chemical, and thermal EOR methods, although many planned projects were abandoned after oil-price declines.

EOR field projects in U.S. carbonate reservoirs

Field performance, technical feasibility, and design parameters of gas, chemical, and thermal EOR methods, including CO2 flooding, in carbonate reservoirs

Publication Details
Publication Date
2007-12-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Eduardo Manrique
Mariano Gurfinkel
Viviana Eugenia Muci
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%