Keeping up with the Times: The Transformation of the Publicity Regime with New Movable Property Security Rights and Developments in Blockchain Technology
Не отставать от времени: трансформация режима публичности в связи с новыми обеспечительными правами на движимое имущество и развитием блокчейн-технологий
2020-12-01
SCID: 54.1/e6jn9w9t
Discuss with AI
blockchain registriesmovable propertypledge and possessionpublicity regimesecurity rights
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Abstract For a long time, the publicity regime over movable property has been associated with possession. Many modern legal systems still operate on Roman law principles concerning the validity of transactions: Whoever is in possession of a movable asset generates the legal presumption that he or she rightfully owns that asset. Immovable assets on the other hand are tied to a different concept due to the value and meaning ascribed to them. Whereas possession signals who has which rights to claim against whom, inscriptions made in a public registry (such as a land registry) determine the fate of immovable property. Over time, reforms in the law on secured transactions have resulted in a less strict approach adopted in executing transaction relating to movable property to enable the establishment of limited rights in rem and their implementation. Regardless, most civil law jurisdictions still deem the transfer of possession as compulsory for a valid right of pledge over movable property. This article elaborates on the most significant changes to the field of property law and why certain countries may reconsider their traditional approach, especially since yet another wave of change is coming in the form of Blockchain registries. Although certain countries’ legal systems are bound to the old-fashioned principle dating back to Germanic and Roman laws, many others like the Belgian, French and Turkish systems have modernized their publicity regime applied on movable assets and have a special registry, whether regional or nationwide, for transactions related to movables. While providing a few examples from common law countries, this article is an in-depth, comparative analysis into the current condition of Swiss law on this matter and the modifications implemented under French and Turkish law. In the last section, the article reviews the imminent interaction between the publicity regime of immovables and blockchain technology.
Key Findings
1
Belgium, France, and Turkey have implemented special registries for movable property transactions, replacing or supplementing possession-based publicity.
2
Blockchain registries present an imminent wave of change that will interact with and potentially transform current publicity regimes governing immovables and movables.
3
Most civil law jurisdictions still require transfer of possession for a valid pledge over movable property, but some countries have modernized this.
4
Reforms in secured transactions have relaxed strict possession requirements to allow limited rights in rem over movables.
5
Traditional publicity regime for movables relies on possession as legal presumption of ownership in many civil law systems.
Research Object
Publicity regime for movable property (including registries and practices governing publicity of rights in movables)
Research Subject
Transformation and legal effects of publicity rules for movable property—including possession-based presumptions, registry-based reforms, establishment of limited rights in rem, comparative changes in civil-law systems (Belgian, French, Turkish, Swiss) and the impact of blockchain registries on the publicity regime
Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-12-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest