Domestic Politics, China's Rise, and the Future of the Liberal International Order

Внутренняя политика, возвышение Китая и будущее либерального международного порядка
Jessica Chen Weiss, Jeremy Wallace
2021-01-01

China's riseChinese Communist Party ruleLiberal International Orderdomestic political variablesinternational institutions
Abstract With the future of liberal internationalism in question, how will China's growing power and influence reshape world politics? We argue that views of the Liberal International Order (LIO) as integrative and resilient have been too optimistic for two reasons. First, China's ability to profit from within the system has shaken the domestic consensus in the United States on preserving the existing LIO. Second, features of Chinese Communist Party rule chafe against many of the fundamental principles of the LIO, but could coexist with a return to Westphalian principles and markets that are embedded in domestic systems of control. How, then, do authoritarian states like China pick and choose how to engage with key institutions and norms within the LIO? We propose a framework that highlights two domestic variables—centrality and heterogeneity—and their implications for China's international behavior. We illustrate the framework with examples from China's approach to climate change, trade and exchange rates, Internet governance, territorial sovereignty, arms control, and humanitarian intervention. Finally, we conclude by considering what alternative versions of international order might emerge as China's influence grows.
1
As China’s influence expands, alternative forms of international order may emerge rather than simple integration into the existing LIO.
2
China’s engagement with LIO institutions and norms is shaped by two domestic variables: the centrality and heterogeneity of the relevant issue.
3
Core features of Chinese Communist Party rule conflict with fundamental LIO principles, while Chinese governance may coexist with Westphalian sovereignty and market mechanisms embedded in domestic control.
4
The Liberal International Order is less integrative and resilient than often assumed, partly because China’s success within it has weakened U.S. domestic support for preserving it.
5
The framework explains variation in China’s international behavior across climate change, trade and exchange rates, Internet governance, sovereignty, arms control, and humanitarian intervention.

China's engagement with the Liberal International Order (LIO) and its key institutions and norms

How domestic political variables—centrality and heterogeneity—shape China's selective international behavior and the potential transformation of the LIO

Publication Details
Publication Date
2021-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
168
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Jessica Chen Weiss
Jeremy Wallace
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%