The Role of Cultural Heritage in Sustainable Development: Multidimensional Indicators as Decision-Making Tool
Роль культурного наследия в устойчивом развитии: многомерные индикаторы как инструмент принятия решений
2017-10-19
SCID: 54.1/e7h498c4
Discuss with AI
cultural heritage conservationcultural landscapeculture-led regenerationmultidimensional indicatorssustainable development
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
The concept of sustainable development has been the main topic of many international conferences. Although many discussions are related to the role of cultural heritage in sustainable development, they develop only on theoretical level. The answer to the main question, that is if the cultural landscape can play a role in sustainable development, could be positive only if we are able to produce empirical evidence about its contribution to improve economic, social, and environmental productivity of the city. It is necessary to produce empirical evidence to demonstrate that cultural heritage conservation/valorization is an investment and not a cost. To date, there are few researches about the indicators that are able to support the relationship between cultural heritage conservation/regeneration and sustainable development. This paper intends to go beyond this limit and approach this issue in operational terms. It is focused on the role that cultural heritage can play in the sustainable development framework. An assessment framework that is able to capture the multidimensional benefits of cultural landscape conservation/valorization is proposed here starting from the analysis of 40 case studies of culture-led regeneration projects. A matrix of multidimensional indicators (divided into nine categories) about the impacts produced by these 40 cultural heritage conservation/valorization projects and its critical analysis is here proposed, mainly focusing the attention on the double relationship between the tourism sector and climate change. Although the analyses often refer to sustainability, it is not concretely addressed because there is an imbalance among the dimensions: in most cases, only the economic component is highlighted, leaving out the social and environmental dimensions. Furthermore, the impacts related to cultural-led projects are mainly interpreted in terms of tourism and real estate impacts.
Key Findings
1
Cultural heritage conservation can be evaluated as an investment in economic, social, and environmental productivity rather than solely as a cost.
2
Existing cultural-led project assessments disproportionately emphasize economic outcomes, especially tourism and real-estate impacts, while neglecting social and environmental dimensions.
3
The framework derives from analysis of 40 culture-led regeneration projects and organizes impact indicators into nine categories.
4
The framework specifically examines the reciprocal relationship between tourism and climate change within cultural heritage sustainability assessment.
5
The paper proposes an operational assessment framework for measuring the multidimensional benefits of cultural landscape conservation and valorization.
Research Object
cultural heritage conservation/valorization projects and cultural landscapes in the context of sustainable development
Research Subject
the multidimensional economic, social, and environmental contributions and impacts of cultural heritage conservation/valorization, including its relationships with tourism and climate change
Publication Details
Publication Date
2017-10-19
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest