Application of artificial intelligence in cervical cytology: a systematic review of deep learning models, datasets, and reported metrics

Применение искусственного интеллекта в цитологии шейки матки: систематический обзор моделей глубокого обучения, наборов данных и представленных метрик
Miguel Angel Valles-Coral, Lloy Pinedo, Ciro Rodríguez, Diego Rodriguez, Keller Sánchez-Dávila, Lolita Arévalo-Fasanando, Nelly Reátegui-Lozano
2026-01-02

SIPaKMeD datasetVision Transformerscervical cytologydeep learning modelssystematic review
Introduction: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in cervical cytology has increased substantially due to the need for automated tools that support the early detection of precancerous lesions. Methods: This systematic review examined deep learning models applied to cervical cytology images, focusing on the architectures used, the datasets employed, and the performance metrics reported. Articles published between 2022 and 2025 were retrieved from Scopus using PRISMA methodology. After applying inclusion criteria and full-text screening, 77 studies were included for RQ1 (models), 75 for RQ2 (datasets), and 71 for RQ3 (metrics). Results: Hybrid models were the most prevalent (56%), followed by convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and a growing number of Vision Transformer (ViT)-based approaches. SIPaKMeD and Herlev were the most frequently used datasets, although the use of private datasets is increasing. Accuracy was the most commonly reported metric (mean 87.76%), followed by precision, recall, and F1-score. Several hybrid and ViT-based models exceeded 92% accuracy. Identified limitations included limited cross-validation, reduced clinical representativeness of datasets, and inconsistent diagnostic criteria. Discussion: This review synthesizes current trends in AI-based cervical cytology, highlights common methodological limitations, and proposes directions for future research to enhance clinical applicability and standardization.
1
Accuracy was the most commonly reported metric, with a mean of 87.76%; several hybrid and Vision Transformer models exceeded 92% accuracy.
2
Hybrid deep learning models were most prevalent, representing 56% of reviewed approaches, followed by CNNs and increasingly used Vision Transformers.
3
Major limitations included limited cross-validation, poor clinical representativeness of datasets, and inconsistent diagnostic criteria, restricting clinical applicability and standardization.
4
SIPaKMeD and Herlev were the most frequently used cervical cytology datasets, while reliance on private datasets increased.
5
The systematic review included 77 studies on models, 75 on datasets, and 71 on performance metrics published between 2022 and 2025.

cervical cytology images and the deep learning models applied to them

the architectures, datasets, performance metrics, methodological limitations, and clinical applicability of AI-based analysis of cervical cytology

Publication Details
Publication Date
2026-01-02
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
6
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Miguel Angel Valles-Coral
Lloy Pinedo
Ciro Rodríguez
Diego Rodriguez
Keller Sánchez-Dávila
Lolita Arévalo-Fasanando
Nelly Reátegui-Lozano
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%