Life cycle assessment of the environmental performance of conventional and organic methods of open field pepper cultivation system

Оценка жизненного цикла экологических характеристик традиционной и органической систем выращивания перца в открытом грунте
Efthalia Chatzisymeon, Spyros Foteinis, Alistair G.L. Borthwick
2016-09-24

ReCiPe impact assessmentconventional agriculturefreshwater eutrophicationlife cycle assessmentorganic pepper cultivation
As the scale of the organic cultivation sector keeps increasing, there is growing demand for reliable data on organic agriculture and its effect on the environment. Conventional agriculture uses chemical fertilizers and pesticides, whilst organic cultivation mainly relies on crop rotation and organic fertilizers. The aim of this work is to quantify and compare the environmental sustainability of typical conventional and organic pepper cultivation systems. Two open field pepper cultivations, both located in the Anthemountas basin, Northern Greece, are selected as case studies. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is used to quantify the overall environmental footprint and identify particular environmental weaknesses (i.e. unsustainable practices) of each cultivation system. Results are analysed at both midpoint and endpoint levels in order to obtain a comprehensive overview of the environmental sustainability of each system. Attributional LCA (ALCA) is employed to identify emissions associated with the life cycles of the two systems. Results are presented for problem-oriented (midpoint) and damage-oriented (endpoint) approaches, using ReCiPe impact assessment. At midpoint level, conventional cultivation exhibits about threefold higher environmental impact on freshwater eutrophication, than organic cultivation. This arises from the extensive use of nitrogen and phosphorus-based fertilizers, with consequent direct emissions to the environment. The remaining impact categories are mainly affected by irrigation, with associated indirect emissions linked to electricity production. At endpoint level, the main hotspots identified for conventional cultivation are irrigation and fertilizing, due to intensive use of chemical fertilizers and (to a lesser degree) pesticides. For organic pepper cultivation, the main environmental hotspots are irrigation, machinery use, and manure loading and spreading processes. Of these, the highest score for irrigation derives from the heavy electricity consumption required for groundwater pumping associated with the fossil-fuel-dependent Greek electricity mix. Organic and conventional cultivation systems have similar total environmental impacts per unit of product, with organic cultivation achieving lower environmental impacts in ‘freshwater eutrophication’, ‘climate change’, ‘terrestrial acidification’ and ‘marine eutrophication’ categories. Conventional cultivation has a significantly greater effect on the freshwater eutrophication impact category, due to phosphate emissions arising from application of chemical fertilizers.
1
A comparative attributional life cycle assessment evaluated the environmental sustainability of conventional and organic open-field pepper cultivation in Northern Greece.
2
Conventional cultivation caused approximately threefold higher freshwater eutrophication impacts than organic cultivation, primarily because of extensive nitrogen- and phosphorus-based fertilizer use.
3
For conventional cultivation, endpoint hotspots were irrigation and fertilization, with pesticides contributing to a lesser extent.
4
For organic cultivation, the main endpoint hotspots were irrigation, machinery use, and manure loading and spreading.
5
Irrigation was a major contributor to environmental impacts in both systems, largely through indirect emissions associated with electricity production.

Conventional and organic open-field pepper cultivation systems in the Anthemountas basin, Northern Greece

Comparative life-cycle environmental performance, impacts, emissions, and environmental hotspots of the two pepper cultivation systems

Publication Details
Publication Date
2016-09-24
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Efthalia Chatzisymeon
Spyros Foteinis
Alistair G.L. Borthwick
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%