Tax Treaty Shopping: Risk Analysis at the Macro Level (on the Example of the Republic of Armenia)

Использование налоговых соглашений: анализ рисков на макроуровне (на примере Республики Армения)
M. R. Pinskaya, Nikolai Milogolov, S. F. Adamyan
2018-01-01

Principal Purpose Testdouble tax treatiesforeign direct investment to GDPtax base erosiontax treaty shopping
The article analyzes domestic tax legislation of the Republic of Armenia and main countries investing in Armenia in combination with double tax treaties concluded between Armenia and these countries.The aim of such analysis is to find out the riskiest double tax treaties in terms of tax treaty shopping potential.Research approach is based on assessment of indicator characterizing country position in the global investment and capital flows comparing to the main countries investing in Armenia.This indicator is determined as ratio of foreign direct investment to gross domestic product.Based on this assessment countries-investors were divided to two groups according to the level of tax base erosion risk.The article further presents the detailed analysis of national legislation and double tax treaties with these countries.Moreover, the authors discuss international experience of developing legal approaches towards addressing the issue of tax treaty abuse, such as Principle Purpose Test, Limitation of Benefits Rule and Concept of Beneficial Owner of Income.The authors also analyze international experience of formulating the criteria of assessment of necessary conditions for obtaining tax treaty benefits.These approaches can be used for development of international tax policy in the Republic of Armenia with the aim of defending its sovereign tax base and creating certain and sustainable business and tax rules for foreign investors and domestic taxpayers expanding overseas.
1
Investor countries are divided into two groups according to their assessed risk of tax-base erosion, followed by detailed analysis of relevant legislation and treaties.
2
It uses the ratio of foreign direct investment to gross domestic product to assess countries’ positions in global investment and capital flows.
3
The analysis reviews international safeguards against treaty abuse, including the Principal Purpose Test, Limitation of Benefits rules, and the beneficial-owner concept.
4
The study identifies Armenia’s riskiest double tax treaties by evaluating treaty-shopping potential across major countries investing in Armenia.
5
These approaches could support Armenia’s international tax policy by protecting its tax base while establishing predictable rules for investors and residents expanding abroad.

Double tax treaties between the Republic of Armenia and its main investing countries, together with the relevant domestic tax legislation

Tax treaty shopping potential and tax base erosion risks associated with these treaties, including the conditions for obtaining treaty benefits

Publication Details
Publication Date
2018-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
M. R. Pinskaya
Nikolai Milogolov
S. F. Adamyan
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%