Barnabas and the Riddle of the Didache Revisited

Варнава и загадка Дидахе: переосмысление
Jonathan A. Draper
1995-10-01

Epistle of BarnabasJewish ChristianityTwo Ways materialirony (rhetorical strategy)
Most scholars in recent years have concentrated on identifying the sources of the Epistle of Barnabas, minimizing the creativity of its author and denying that it has a recognizable context. This article focuses on the use of the Two Ways material in Barnabas and its redaction to argue that there is a clear polemical thrust against Jewish Christianity. The author utilizes the classical rhetorical strategy of irony to subvert the original setting of the Two Ways material in catechesis for Gentile converts. Instead the material is recast as advanced gnosis for the elite. It is in this capacity that the Two Ways survives in the West. This purpose and strategy pervades the whole document.
1
Barnabas recasts the Two Ways material as advanced gnosis intended for an elite audience.
2
The Epistle of Barnabas uses and redacts the Two Ways material with a clear polemical thrust against Jewish Christianity.
3
The author of Barnabas employs classical rhetorical irony to subvert the original catechetical setting for Gentile converts.
4
The recasting explains how the Two Ways tradition survives in the Western context.
5
The strategy of using irony and elite gnosis pervades the entire document.

The Epistle of Barnabas (with emphasis on its use of the Two Ways material)

The redactional use and rhetorical function of the Two Ways material in Barnabas—specifically its ironic subversion, polemical thrust against Jewish Christianity, and recasting as advanced gnosis for Gentile elites

Publication Details
Publication Date
1995-10-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Jonathan A. Draper
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%