Texture methods for evaluating meat and meat analogue structures: A review

Методы оценки структуры мяса и мясных аналогов по текстурным характеристикам: обзор
Floor K.G. Schreuders, Miek Schlangen, Konstantina Kyriakopoulou, Remko M. Boom, Atze Jan van der Goot
2021-04-01

Texture Profile Analysishyperspectral imagingmeat analoguestexture analysisthermomechanical processing
Meat analogue products are considered to help consumers reducing their meat consumption. Their key success factor is their high similarity in sensory properties compared to meat. Even though the structure and texture characteristics of meat are well documented, dedicated methods used to analyse meat analogues are limited still. This review summarises texture and structure analysis methods of meat and meat analogues: mechanical testing; for example Texture Profile Analysis, spectroscopy; for example NMR and imaging techniques; for example hyperspectral imaging. Furthermore, the advantages and limitations of each texture and structure method are described. Finally, characterizations aspects specific to meat analogues are discussed. Promising methods for future research are described that have potential to get more insight into the fibers of meat analogues and the structure development during thermomechanical processing of meat analogues. To be commercially successful for large groups of consumers, alternatives for meat should be highly similar to meat. That is why meat analogues should resemble existing meat in their texture. It is thus important to understand the texture properties with the help of relevant techniques, such as mechanical, spectroscopy and imaging techniques. In this manuscript, we describe promising texture methods for characterization of properties specific to meat analogues. The development of novel techniques to quantify meat analogue properties will stimulate the development of meat analogues that satisfy the values and wishes of consumers.
1
Each characterization method offers distinct advantages and limitations, requiring method selection according to the properties being measured.
2
Existing methods for characterizing meat structure and texture are well established, but dedicated analytical methods for meat analogues remain limited.
3
Future techniques should better quantify meat-analogue fiber structures and structural development during thermomechanical processing.
4
Improved quantitative characterization methods can support development of meat analogues that more closely satisfy consumer preferences and expectations.
5
Meat analogues’ commercial success depends strongly on matching meat’s sensory properties, particularly its texture and structure.
6
The review evaluates mechanical testing, spectroscopy, and imaging techniques, including Texture Profile Analysis, NMR, and hyperspectral imaging.

meat and meat analogue products, including their fibrous structures

texture and structural characteristics of meat and meat analogues, including methods for their characterization and structure development during thermomechanical processing

Publication Details
Publication Date
2021-04-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
248
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Floor K.G. Schreuders
Miek Schlangen
Konstantina Kyriakopoulou
Remko M. Boom
Atze Jan van der Goot
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%