Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU

Клинические практические рекомендации по профилактике и ведению боли, ажитации/седации, делирия, обездвиженности и нарушений сна у взрослых пациентов в отделении интенсивной терапии
Waleed Alhazzani, Bram Rochwerg, Jean‐François Payen, Chris Winkelman, Gilles L. Fraser, Xavier Drouot, Linda Denehy, Dale M. Needham, Arjen J. C. Slooter, Carrie Price, John P. Kress, John W. Devlin, Paul M. Szumita, Gerald L. Weinhouse, John Centofanti, Mark Nunnally, Sharon McKinley, Kathleen Puntillo, Michelle E. Kho, Céline Gélinas, Aaron M. Joffe, Gérald Chanques, Cheryl Misak, Brenda T. Pun, Michele C. Balas, Karen J. Bosma, Yoanna Skrobik, Pratik P. Pandharipande, Paula L. Watson, Mark van den Boogaard, Nathan E. Brummel, Jocelyn E. Harris, Julie Lanphere, Karin J. Neufeld, Margaret A. Pisani, Richard R. Riker, Bryce R. H. Robinson, Yahya Shehabi, Sina Nikayin, Pamela Flood, Ken Kiedrowski
2018-08-16

ICU clinical practice guidelinesagitation and sedationdelirium preventionearly mobilization and rehabilitationpain management
OBJECTIVE: To update and expand the 2013 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pain, Agitation, and Delirium in Adult Patients in the ICU. DESIGN: Thirty-two international experts, four methodologists, and four critical illness survivors met virtually at least monthly. All section groups gathered face-to-face at annual Society of Critical Care Medicine congresses; virtual connections included those unable to attend. A formal conflict of interest policy was developed a priori and enforced throughout the process. Teleconferences and electronic discussions among subgroups and whole panel were part of the guidelines' development. A general content review was completed face-to-face by all panel members in January 2017. METHODS: Content experts, methodologists, and ICU survivors were represented in each of the five sections of the guidelines: Pain, Agitation/sedation, Delirium, Immobility (mobilization/rehabilitation), and Sleep (disruption). Each section created Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome, and nonactionable, descriptive questions based on perceived clinical relevance. The guideline group then voted their ranking, and patients prioritized their importance. For each Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome question, sections searched the best available evidence, determined its quality, and formulated recommendations as "strong," "conditional," or "good" practice statements based on Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation principles. In addition, evidence gaps and clinical caveats were explicitly identified. RESULTS: The Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility (mobilization/rehabilitation), and Sleep (disruption) panel issued 37 recommendations (three strong and 34 conditional), two good practice statements, and 32 ungraded, nonactionable statements. Three questions from the patient-centered prioritized question list remained without recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: We found substantial agreement among a large, interdisciplinary cohort of international experts regarding evidence supporting recommendations, and the remaining literature gaps in the assessment, prevention, and treatment of Pain, Agitation/sedation, Delirium, Immobility (mobilization/rehabilitation), and Sleep (disruption) in critically ill adults. Highlighting this evidence and the research needs will improve Pain, Agitation/sedation, Delirium, Immobility (mobilization/rehabilitation), and Sleep (disruption) management and provide the foundation for improved outcomes and science in this vulnerable population.
1
Development involved 32 international experts, four methodologists, and four critical illness survivors using GRADE-based evidence assessment and formal conflict-of-interest management.
2
Patient prioritization informed the guideline questions, while evidence gaps and clinical caveats were explicitly identified.
3
The guidelines update and expand the 2013 recommendations to address pain, agitation/sedation, delirium, immobility, and sleep disruption in adult ICU patients.
4
The panel issued 37 recommendations: three strong and 34 conditional, alongside two good practice statements and 32 ungraded, nonactionable statements.
5
Three patient-prioritized questions remained without recommendations, indicating persistent evidence limitations.

Adult patients in the intensive care unit (critically ill adults)

the prevention and management of pain, agitation/sedation, delirium, immobility, and sleep disruption

Publication Details
Publication Date
2018-08-16
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Waleed Alhazzani
Bram Rochwerg
Jean‐François Payen
Chris Winkelman
Gilles L. Fraser
Xavier Drouot
Linda Denehy
Dale M. Needham
Arjen J. C. Slooter
Carrie Price
John P. Kress
John W. Devlin
Paul M. Szumita
Gerald L. Weinhouse
John Centofanti
Mark Nunnally
Sharon McKinley
Kathleen Puntillo
Michelle E. Kho
Céline Gélinas
Aaron M. Joffe
Gérald Chanques
Cheryl Misak
Brenda T. Pun
Michele C. Balas
Karen J. Bosma
Yoanna Skrobik
Pratik P. Pandharipande
Paula L. Watson
Mark van den Boogaard
Nathan E. Brummel
Jocelyn E. Harris
Julie Lanphere
Karin J. Neufeld
Margaret A. Pisani
Richard R. Riker
Bryce R. H. Robinson
Yahya Shehabi
Sina Nikayin
Pamela Flood
Ken Kiedrowski
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%