Waist Circumference and Waist/Hip Ratio Are Better Predictive Risk Factors for Mortality and Morbidity after Colorectal Surgery Than Body Mass Index and Body Surface Area
Окружность талии и соотношение окружности талии и бедер являются лучшими прогностическими факторами риска смертности и заболеваемости после колоректальной хирургии, чем индекс массы тела и площадь поверхности тела
2013-10-07
SCID: 54.1/f4d3s9vn
Discuss with AI
body mass indexcolorectal surgerypostoperative morbiditypostoperative mortalitywaist-hip ratio
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
In Brief Objectives: To determine whether body fat distribution, measured by waist circumference (WC) and waist/hip ratio (WHR), is a better predictor of mortality and morbidity after colorectal surgery than body mass index (BMI) or body surface area (BSA). Background: Obesity measured by BMI is not a consistent risk factor for postoperative mortality and morbidity after abdominal surgery. Studies in metabolic and cardiovascular diseases have shown WC and WHR to be better outcome predictors than BMI. Methods: A prospective multicenter international study was conducted among patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. The WHR, BMI, and BSA were derived from body weight, height, and waist and hip circumferences measured preoperatively. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for postoperative outcomes. Results: A total of 1349 patients (754 men) from 38 centers in 11 countries were included. Increasing WHR significantly increased the risk of conversion [odds ratio (OR) = 15.7, relative risk (RR) = 4.1], intraoperative complications (OR = 11.0, RR = 3.2), postoperative surgical complications (OR = 7.7, RR = 2.0), medical complications (OR = 13.2, RR = 2.5), anastomotic leak (OR = 13.7, RR = 3.3), reoperations (OR = 13.3, RR = 2.9), and death (OR = 653.1, RR = 21.8). Both BMI (OR = 39.5, RR = 1.1) and BSA (OR = 4.9, RR = 3.1) were associated with an increased risk of abdominal wound complication. In multivariate analysis, the WHR predicted intraoperative complications, conversion, medical complications, and reinterventions, whereas BMI was a risk factor only for abdominal wall complications; BSA did not reach significance for any outcome. Conclusions: The WHR is predictive of adverse events after elective colorectal surgery. It should be used in routine clinical practice and in future risk-estimating systems. Prospective multicenter international study comparing correlation of measures of obesity with postoperative mortality/morbidity after colorectal surgery among 1349 patients. Waist/hip ratio is a stronger risk factor than body mass index for intraoperative complications, conversion, medical complications, and reoperations. The authors recommend adding the waist/hip ratio to routine practice for risk estimation before colorectal surgery.
Key Findings
1
BMI predicted abdominal wound complications only, while body surface area was not significant for any outcome after multivariate adjustment.
2
In a prospective international multicenter study of 1,349 patients, waist/hip ratio (WHR) strongly predicted adverse outcomes after elective colorectal surgery.
3
Increasing WHR was associated with conversion, intraoperative and postoperative complications, anastomotic leak, reoperation, and death, with death showing OR 653.1 and RR 21.8.
4
Multivariate analysis showed WHR independently predicted intraoperative complications, conversion, medical complications, and reinterventions.
5
The findings support incorporating WHR into routine clinical assessment and future risk-estimation systems for colorectal surgery.
Research Object
Patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery
Research Subject
The predictive relationship of body-fat distribution measures (waist-to-hip ratio and waist circumference) versus BMI and BSA with postoperative mortality, morbidity, and other adverse outcomes
Publication Details
Publication Date
2013-10-07
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest