Limits of Brazil’s Forest Code as a means to end illegal deforestation
Ограничения Лесного кодекса Бразилии как инструмента прекращения незаконной вырубки лесов
2017-07-03
SCID: 54.1/f6cvazxf
Discuss with AI
Brazilian Forest CodeSICAR land registryforest restorationgeospatial analysisillegal deforestation
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
The 2012 Brazilian Forest Code governs the fate of forests and savannas on Brazil's 394 Mha of privately owned lands. The government claims that a new national land registry (SICAR), introduced under the revised law, could end illegal deforestation by greatly reducing the cost of monitoring, enforcement, and compliance. This study evaluates that potential, using data from state-level land registries (CAR) in Pará and Mato Grosso that were precursors of SICAR. Using geospatial analyses and stakeholder interviews, we quantify the impact of CAR on deforestation and forest restoration, investigating how landowners adjust their behaviors over time. Our results indicate rapid adoption of CAR, with registered properties covering a total of 57 Mha by 2013. This suggests that the financial incentives to join CAR currently exceed the costs. Registered properties initially showed lower deforestation rates than unregistered ones, but these differences varied by property size and diminished over time. Moreover, only 6% of registered producers reported taking steps to restore illegally cleared areas on their properties. Our results suggest that, from the landowner's perspective, full compliance with the Forest Code offers few economic benefits. Achieving zero illegal deforestation in this context would require the private sector to include full compliance as a market criterion, while state and federal governments develop SICAR as a de facto enforcement mechanism. These results are relevant to other tropical countries and underscore the importance of developing a policy mix that creates lasting incentives for sustainable land-use practices.
Key Findings
1
Brazil’s rural land registry was rapidly adopted, with registered properties covering 57 Mha by 2013, indicating that participation incentives exceeded current enrollment costs.
2
Full compliance with Brazil’s Forest Code provides few economic benefits to landowners, limiting the registry’s capacity to end illegal deforestation without stronger incentives.
3
Only 6% of registered producers reported taking steps to restore areas illegally cleared on their properties.
4
Registered properties initially had lower deforestation rates than unregistered properties, but the difference varied by property size and declined over time.
5
Zero illegal deforestation would require market-based compliance criteria and development of the national registry as an effective enforcement mechanism, alongside broader policy incentives for sustainable land use.
Research Object
Brazilian privately owned forest and savanna lands regulated by the 2012 Forest Code, particularly registered and unregistered properties in Pará and Mato Grosso
Research Subject
The effects of land-registry enrollment and Forest Code compliance incentives on deforestation, forest restoration, and landowner behavior over time
Publication Details
Publication Date
2017-07-03
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest