Comparison of curative surgery and definitive chemoradiotherapy as initial treatment for patients with cervical esophageal cancer

Сравнение радикального хирургического лечения и радикальной химиолучевой терапии в качестве начального лечения пациентов с раком шейного отдела пищевода
Hirofumi Yasui, Tetsuro Onitsuka, Takahiro Tsushima, Satoru Matsuda, Katsushi Takebayashi, Yasuhiro Tsubosa, Keisuke Kawamorita, Masahiro Niihara, Tomoya Yokota, Hiroshi Sato, Yusuke Onozawa, Hirofumi Ogawa, Tomoyuki Kamijo, Masahiro Nakagawa
2016-11-01

cervical esophageal cancercomplete response ratecurative surgerydefinitive chemoradiotherapysalvage surgery
Esophagectomy and definitive chemoradiotherapy are recognized standard initial treatment modalities for cervical esophageal cancer. The goal of this study was to compare the treatment outcomes of curative surgery with those of chemoradiotherapy in patients who had potentially resectable tumor and who were candidates for surgery. We evaluated the data from 49 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with potentially resectable cervical esophageal cancer and who were deemed candidates for surgery. Thirteen patients were included in the surgery group, and 36 patients were included in chemoradiotherapy group. Baseline characteristics were balanced between the two groups. In the chemoradiotherapy group, the complete response rate was 58.3%. There was no significant difference in 5-year overall survival when comparing the surgery group and the chemoradiotherapy group (surgery, 60.6%; chemoradiotherapy, 51.4%; P = 0.89). In the chemoradiotherapy group, of the 15 patients who failed to respond to initial treatment, 11 patients subsequently underwent salvage surgery. In conclusion, curative surgery and chemoradiotherapy as initial treatment for cervical esophageal cancer have comparable survival outcomes. Chemoradiotherapy should be selected as the initial larynx-preserving treatment for patients with cervical esophageal cancer although chemoradiotherapy non-responders require additional treatment, including salvage surgery.
1
Among chemoradiotherapy non-responders, 11 of 15 patients underwent salvage surgery after initial treatment failure.
2
Baseline characteristics were balanced between the surgery (n=13) and chemoradiotherapy (n=36) groups in this study of 49 consecutive, potentially resectable patients.
3
Chemoradiotherapy is recommended as the initial larynx-preserving treatment for cervical esophageal cancer, with the caveat that non-responders require additional treatments including salvage surgery.
4
In patients with potentially resectable cervical esophageal cancer, curative surgery and definitive chemoradiotherapy as initial treatments yielded comparable 5-year overall survival (surgery 60.6% vs chemoradiotherapy 51.4%; P = 0.89).
5
The complete response rate in the chemoradiotherapy group was 58.3%.

Patients with potentially resectable cervical esophageal cancer

Comparison of treatment outcomes (including complete response rate, need for salvage surgery, and 5-year overall survival) between curative surgery and definitive chemoradiotherapy as initial treatments

Publication Details
Publication Date
2016-11-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Hirofumi Yasui
Tetsuro Onitsuka
Takahiro Tsushima
Satoru Matsuda
Katsushi Takebayashi
Yasuhiro Tsubosa
Keisuke Kawamorita
Masahiro Niihara
Tomoya Yokota
Hiroshi Sato
Yusuke Onozawa
Hirofumi Ogawa
Tomoyuki Kamijo
Masahiro Nakagawa
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%