externalism about contentpragmaticspresuppositionpropositional attitudesspeech acts
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Abstract A collection about the intentionality of speech acts and propositional attitudes. The chapters in the first section develop a framework for pragmatics—the study of the interaction of speech acts and the contexts in which they are performed. The framework is used to defend and apply a pragmatic conception of presupposition, to account for the role of indicative conditional statements in reasoning, and to solve some puzzles about statements of identity and existence. The chapters in the second section concern the semantics of the attribution of belief and other propositional attitudes. They attempt to reconcile the possible‐worlds analysis of propositional content with the phenomena, including de re belief attribution and the attribution of indexical or self‐locating belief. The chapters in the third section defend an externalist account of the contents of thought. It is argued that there is no reason to think a viable account of narrow content can be developed, and that none is needed to provide an adequate account of the role of intentional content in the explanation of behaviour and experience. The chapters in the fourth section discuss the relation between the content of thoughts and the forms in which content is represented and expressed. It is argued that the temptation to build linguistic structure into the content of thought should be resisted since it does not provide the material for an adequate solution to the problems that plague the possible‐worlds conception of proposition, such as the problem of logical omniscience.
Key Findings
1
A pragmatic framework for speech acts and contexts is developed and used to defend a pragmatic conception of presupposition.
2
A reconciliation is attempted between possible‑worlds analyses of propositional content and phenomena like de re belief attribution and indexical/self‑locating belief.
3
An externalist account of thought content is defended, arguing there is no viable or necessary account of narrow content for explaining behavior and experience.
4
It is argued that linguistic structure should not be built into the content of thought, since it fails to solve problems of the possible‑worlds conception (e.g., logical omniscience).
5
The pragmatic framework accounts for the role of indicative conditionals in reasoning and resolves puzzles about identity and existence statements.
Research Object
Intentionality of speech acts and propositional attitudes (the contents of speech and thought)
Research Subject
The interaction between context and content: pragmatic framework for speech acts and presupposition, semantics of belief attribution (including de re and indexical/self-locating beliefs), and externalist accounts of mental content versus narrow content and representational form
Publication Details
Publication Date
1999-04-08
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest