Comparative Analysis of On-Board Methane and Methanol Reforming Systems Combined with HT-PEM Fuel Cell and CO2 Capture/Liquefaction System for Hydrogen Fueled Ship Application
Сравнительный анализ судовых систем риформинга метана и метанола, объединённых с высокотемпературным протон-обменным топливным элементом и системой улавливания и сжижения CO2, для применения на судах с водородным топливом
2020-01-02
SCID: 54.1/fhprcwah
Discuss with AI
CO2 capture and liquefactionHT-PEM fuel cellhydrogen-fueled shipssteam methane reformingsteam methanol reforming
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
This study performs energetic and exergetic comparisons between the steam methane reforming and steam methanol reforming technologies combined with HT-PEMFC and a carbon capture/liquefaction system for use in hydrogen-fueled ships. The required space for the primary fuel and captured/liquefied CO2 and the fuel cost have also been investigated to find the more advantageous system for ship application. For the comparison, the steam methane reforming-based system fed by LNG and the steam methanol reforming-based system fed by methanol have been modeled in an Aspen HYSYS environment. All the simulations have been conducted at a fixed Wnet, electrical (475 kW) to meet the average shaft power of the reference ship. Results show that at the base condition, the energy and exergy efficiencies of the methanol-based system are 7.99% and 1.89% higher than those of the methane-based system, respectively. The cogeneration efficiency of the methane-based system is 7.13% higher than that of the methanol-based system. The comparison of space for fuel and CO2 storage reveals that the methanol-based system requires a space 1.1 times larger than that of the methane-based system for the total voyage time, although the methanol-based system has higher electrical efficiency. In addition, the methanol-based system has a fuel cost 2.2 times higher than that of the methane-based system to generate 475 kW net of electricity for the total voyage time.
Key Findings
1
At a fixed 475 kW net electrical output, the methanol-based system achieves 7.99% higher energy efficiency and 1.89% higher exergy efficiency than the methane-based system.
2
Despite its higher electrical efficiency, the methanol-based system requires 1.1 times more total space for fuel and captured/liquefied CO₂ storage over the voyage.
3
The methane-based system provides 7.13% higher cogeneration efficiency than the methanol-based system.
4
The methanol-based system has a fuel cost 2.2 times higher than the methane-based system for producing 475 kW net electricity over the total voyage.
5
The study compares LNG-fed steam methane reforming and methanol-fed steam methanol reforming systems integrated with HT-PEM fuel cells and CO₂ capture/liquefaction for hydrogen-fueled ships.
Research Object
On-board steam methane and steam methanol reforming systems integrated with an HT-PEM fuel cell and CO2 capture/liquefaction system for hydrogen-fueled ships
Research Subject
Comparative energetic, exergetic, cogeneration, spatial-storage, and fuel-cost performance of the methane- and methanol-based systems
Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-01-02
Journal
Energies
Publisher
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
ISSN
1996-1073
Cited by
41
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest