Comparative Analysis of On-Board Methane and Methanol Reforming Systems Combined with HT-PEM Fuel Cell and CO2 Capture/Liquefaction System for Hydrogen Fueled Ship Application

Сравнительный анализ судовых систем риформинга метана и метанола, объединённых с высокотемпературным протон-обменным топливным элементом и системой улавливания и сжижения CO2, для применения на судах с водородным топливом
Hyunyong Lee, In-Chul Jung, Gilltae Roh, Youngseung Na, Hokeun Kang
2020-01-02

CO2 capture and liquefactionHT-PEM fuel cellhydrogen-fueled shipssteam methane reformingsteam methanol reforming
This study performs energetic and exergetic comparisons between the steam methane reforming and steam methanol reforming technologies combined with HT-PEMFC and a carbon capture/liquefaction system for use in hydrogen-fueled ships. The required space for the primary fuel and captured/liquefied CO2 and the fuel cost have also been investigated to find the more advantageous system for ship application. For the comparison, the steam methane reforming-based system fed by LNG and the steam methanol reforming-based system fed by methanol have been modeled in an Aspen HYSYS environment. All the simulations have been conducted at a fixed Wnet, electrical (475 kW) to meet the average shaft power of the reference ship. Results show that at the base condition, the energy and exergy efficiencies of the methanol-based system are 7.99% and 1.89% higher than those of the methane-based system, respectively. The cogeneration efficiency of the methane-based system is 7.13% higher than that of the methanol-based system. The comparison of space for fuel and CO2 storage reveals that the methanol-based system requires a space 1.1 times larger than that of the methane-based system for the total voyage time, although the methanol-based system has higher electrical efficiency. In addition, the methanol-based system has a fuel cost 2.2 times higher than that of the methane-based system to generate 475 kW net of electricity for the total voyage time.
1
At a fixed 475 kW net electrical output, the methanol-based system achieves 7.99% higher energy efficiency and 1.89% higher exergy efficiency than the methane-based system.
2
Despite its higher electrical efficiency, the methanol-based system requires 1.1 times more total space for fuel and captured/liquefied CO₂ storage over the voyage.
3
The methane-based system provides 7.13% higher cogeneration efficiency than the methanol-based system.
4
The methanol-based system has a fuel cost 2.2 times higher than the methane-based system for producing 475 kW net electricity over the total voyage.
5
The study compares LNG-fed steam methane reforming and methanol-fed steam methanol reforming systems integrated with HT-PEM fuel cells and CO₂ capture/liquefaction for hydrogen-fueled ships.

On-board steam methane and steam methanol reforming systems integrated with an HT-PEM fuel cell and CO2 capture/liquefaction system for hydrogen-fueled ships

Comparative energetic, exergetic, cogeneration, spatial-storage, and fuel-cost performance of the methane- and methanol-based systems

Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-01-02
Journal
Energies
Publisher
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
ISSN
1996-1073
Cited by
41
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Hyunyong Lee
In-Chul Jung
Gilltae Roh
Youngseung Na
Hokeun Kang
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%