The Cervical Spine of the American Barn Owl (Tyto furcata pratincola): I. Anatomy of the Vertebrae and Regionalization in Their S-Shaped Arrangement

Шейный отдел позвоночника американской сипухи (Tyto furcata pratincola): I. Анатомия позвонков и регионализация их S-образного расположения
Markus Krings, John A. Nyakatura, Martin S. Fischer, Hermann Wagner
2014-03-20

American barn owlcervical spine regionalizationcervical vertebraecluster analysismicro-CT scans
BACKGROUND: Owls possess an extraordinary neck and head mobility. To understand this mobility it is necessary to have an anatomical description of cervical vertebrae with an emphasis on those criteria that are relevant for head positioning. No functional description specific to owls is available. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: X-ray films and micro-CT scans were recorded from American barn owls (Tyto furcata pratincola) and used to obtain three-dimensional head movements and three-dimensional models of the 14 cervical vertebrae (C1-C14). The diameter of the vertebral canal, the zygapophyseal protrusion, the distance between joint centers, and the pitching angle were quantified. Whereas the first two variables are purely osteological characteristics of single vertebrae, the latter two take into account interactions between vertebrae. These variables change in characteristic ways from cranial to caudal. The vertebral canal is wide in the cranial and caudal neck regions, but narrow in the middle, where both the zygapophyseal protrusion and the distance between joint centers are large. Pitching angles are more negative in the cranial and caudal neck regions than in the middle region. Cluster analysis suggested a complex regionalization. Whereas the borders (C1 and C13/C14) formed stable clusters, the other cervical vertebrae were sorted into 4 or 5 additional clusters. The borders of the clusters were influenced by the variables analyzed. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: A statistical analysis was used to evaluate the regionalization of the cervical spine in the barn owl. While earlier measurements have shown that there appear to be three regions of flexibility of the neck, our indicators suggest 3-7 regions. These many regions allow a high degree of flexibility, potentially facilitating the large head turns that barn owls are able to make. The cervical vertebral series of other species should also be investigated using statistical criteria to further characterize morphology and the potential movements associated with it.
1
Cluster analysis identified complex cervical-spine regionalization, with stable boundary clusters at C1 and C13/C14 and four or five additional variable clusters.
2
The middle neck region exhibited greater zygapophyseal protrusion and larger distances between joint centers, while pitching angles were more negative cranially and caudally.
3
The results suggest 3–7 functional neck regions rather than the previously recognized three, potentially supporting the barn owl’s large head movements.
4
Vertebral canal diameter was widest in cranial and caudal neck regions and narrowest in the middle region.
5
X-ray and micro-CT imaging produced three-dimensional models of all 14 cervical vertebrae and quantified anatomical features relevant to barn owl head positioning.

The cervical vertebral series (C1–C14) of the American barn owl (Tyto furcata pratincola)

The anatomical regionalization and cranial-to-caudal variation of vertebral morphology and intervertebral geometry associated with neck flexibility and head positioning

Publication Details
Publication Date
2014-03-20
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Markus Krings
John A. Nyakatura
Martin S. Fischer
Hermann Wagner
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%