Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy in Hematologic Malignancies and Patient-reported Outcomes: A Scoping Review

Терапия Т-клетками с химерным антигенным рецептором при гематологических злокачественных новообразованиях и исходы, сообщаемые пациентами: обзор исследований по картированию доказательств
Fabio Efficace, Laura Cannella, Francesco Sparano, Johannes M. Giesinger, Marco Vignetti, Frédéric Baron, Éduardo Bruera, Mario Luppi, Uwe Platzbecker
2022-12-01

CAR T-cell therapyEQ-5Dhematologic malignanciespatient-reported outcomesscoping review
The inclusion of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy research is critical for understanding the impact of this novel approach from a unique patient standpoint. We performed a scoping review to map the available literature on the use of PRO measures in CAR T-cell therapy studies of patients with hematologic malignancies published between January 2015 and July 2022. Fourteen studies were identified, of which 7 (50%) were investigational early-phase trials, 6 (42.9%) were observational studies, and 1 (7.1%) was a pilot study. The EQ-5D and the PROMIS-29 were the 2 most frequently used PRO measures, being included in 6 (42.9%) and 5 (35.7%) studies, respectively. Despite differences in study designs, there seems to be evidence of improvements over time since CAR T-cell infusion in important domains such as physical functioning and fatigue, at least in patients who respond to therapy. Overall, the studies identified in our review have shown the added value of PRO assessment in CAR T-cell therapy research by providing novel information that complements the knowledge on safety and efficacy. However, there are several questions which remain to be answered in future research. For example, limited evidence exists regarding patient experience during important phases of the disease trajectory as only 4 (28.6%) and 5 (35.7%) studies provided information on PROs during the first 2 weeks from CAR T-cell infusion and after the first year, respectively. Time is ripe for a more systematic implementation of high-quality PRO assessment in future clinical trials and in real-life settings of patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy.
1
A scoping review identified 14 studies using patient-reported outcomes in CAR T-cell therapy for hematologic malignancies published from January 2015 to July 2022.
2
EQ-5D and PROMIS-29 were the most frequently used patient-reported outcome measures, appearing in 6 (42.9%) and 5 (35.7%) studies, respectively.
3
PRO assessments provided information complementing safety and efficacy outcomes, but evidence was limited during the first 2 weeks after infusion and beyond 1 year.
4
Patient-reported physical functioning and fatigue generally improved over time after CAR T-cell infusion, particularly among patients responding to therapy.
5
The literature comprised 7 investigational early-phase trials, 6 observational studies, and 1 pilot study, indicating limited and heterogeneous evidence.
6
The review supports more systematic, high-quality implementation of PRO assessment in future CAR T-cell trials and real-world care.

Patients with hematologic malignancies receiving chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy

Patient-reported outcomes, including physical functioning, fatigue, and patient experience, over time after CAR T-cell infusion

Publication Details
Publication Date
2022-12-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
32
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Fabio Efficace
Laura Cannella
Francesco Sparano
Johannes M. Giesinger
Marco Vignetti
Frédéric Baron
Éduardo Bruera
Mario Luppi
Uwe Platzbecker
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%