A 12-Year Anthropometric Evaluation of the Nose in Bilateral Cleft Lip–Cleft Palate Patients following Nasoalveolar Molding and Cutting Bilateral Cleft Lip and Nose Reconstruction

Двенадцатилетняя антропометрическая оценка носа у пациентов с двусторонней расщелиной верхней губы и нёба после назоальвеолярного формования и первичной реконструкции губы и носа
Barry H. Grayson, Court B. Cutting, Judah S. Garfinkle, Lawrence E. Brecht, Timothy W. King
2011-04-01

alar base widthbilateral cleft lip–cleft palatenasal morphologynasal tip protrusionnasoalveolar molding
BACKGROUND: Patients with bilateral cleft lip-cleft palate have nasal deformities including reduced nasal tip projection, widened ala base, and a deficient or absent columella. The authors compare the nasal morphology of patients treated with presurgical nasoalveolar molding followed by primary lip/nasal reconstruction with age-matched noncleft controls. METHODS: A longitudinal, retrospective review of 77 nonsyndromic patients with bilateral cleft lip-cleft palate was performed. Nasal tip protrusion, alar base width, alar width, columella length, and columella width were measured at five time points spanning 12.5 years. A one-sample t test was used for statistical comparison to an age-matched noncleft population published by Farkas. RESULTS: All five measurements demonstrated parallel, proportional growth in the treatment group relative to the noncleft group. The nasal tip protrusion, alar base width, alar width, columella length, and columella width were not statistically different from those of the noncleft, age-matched control group at age 12.5 years. The nasal tip protrusion also showed no difference in length at 7 and 12.5 years. The alar width and alar base width were significantly wider at the first four time points. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to describe nasal morphology following nasoalveolar molding and primary surgical repair in patients with bilateral cleft lip-cleft palate through the age of 12.5 years. In this investigation, the authors have shown that patients with bilateral cleft lip-cleft palate treated at their institution with nasoalveolar molding and primary nasal reconstruction, performed at the time of their lip repair, attained nearly normal nasal morphology through 12.5 years of age.
1
Alar width and alar base width were significantly wider in the treatment group at the first four time points (early follow-up) compared with controls.
2
At age 12.5 years, nasal tip protrusion, alar base width, alar width, columella length, and columella width were not statistically different from age-matched noncleft controls.
3
In 77 nonsyndromic bilateral cleft lip–cleft palate patients treated with nasoalveolar molding and primary lip/nasal reconstruction, five nasal measurements showed parallel, proportional growth versus noncleft controls over 12.5 years.
4
Nasal tip protrusion showed no significant difference from controls at both 7 and 12.5 years.
5
This study is the first to report nasal morphology outcomes through 12.5 years after nasoalveolar molding and primary nasal reconstruction in bilateral cleft lip–cleft palate patients treated at the authors' institution.

Patients with bilateral cleft lip–cleft palate treated with presurgical nasoalveolar molding followed by primary bilateral cleft lip and nose reconstruction

Longitudinal anthropometric nasal morphology measurements (nasal tip protrusion, alar base width, alar width, columella length and width) over 12.5 years compared to age-matched noncleft controls

Publication Details
Publication Date
2011-04-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Barry H. Grayson
Court B. Cutting
Judah S. Garfinkle
Lawrence E. Brecht
Timothy W. King
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%