Academic Plagiarism Detection

Обнаружение академического плагиата
Béla Gipp, Tomáš Foltýnek, Norman Meuschke
2019-10-16

academic plagiarism detectionmachine learningnon-textual content featuresperformance evaluationsemantic text analysis
This article summarizes the research on computational methods to detect academic plagiarism by systematically reviewing 239 research papers published between 2013 and 2018. To structure the presentation of the research contributions, we propose novel technically oriented typologies for plagiarism prevention and detection efforts, the forms of academic plagiarism, and computational plagiarism detection methods. We show that academic plagiarism detection is a highly active research field. Over the period we review, the field has seen major advances regarding the automated detection of strongly obfuscated and thus hard-to-identify forms of academic plagiarism. These improvements mainly originate from better semantic text analysis methods, the investigation of non-textual content features, and the application of machine learning. We identify a research gap in the lack of methodologically thorough performance evaluations of plagiarism detection systems. Concluding from our analysis, we see the integration of heterogeneous analysis methods for textual and non-textual content features using machine learning as the most promising area for future research contributions to improve the detection of academic plagiarism further.
1
Improvements are mainly due to better semantic text analysis, investigation of non-textual content features, and application of machine learning.
2
Integration of heterogeneous textual and non-textual analysis methods with machine learning is identified as the most promising future research direction.
3
Major advances occurred in automated detection of strongly obfuscated, hard-to-identify plagiarism during the reviewed period.
4
Systematic review of 239 papers (2013–2018) shows academic plagiarism detection is a highly active research field.
5
There is a research gap: a lack of methodologically thorough performance evaluations of plagiarism detection systems.

Academic plagiarism detection systems and methods

Computational approaches and their effectiveness for detecting forms of academic plagiarism, including semantic text analysis, non-textual content features, machine learning integration, and performance evaluation gaps

Publication Details
Publication Date
2019-10-16
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Béla Gipp
Tomáš Foltýnek
Norman Meuschke
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%