The Social History of the Archive: Record-Keeping in Early Modern Europe

Социальная история архива: ведение записей в Европе раннего Нового времени
Alexandra Walsham
2016-01-01

archival appraisalarchival repositoriesearly modern Europerecord-keepingsocial history of archives
Archives are the factories and laboratories of the historian. Along with private studies and public libraries, they are the loci of our apprenticeship as scholars and the warehouses from which we acquire the materials to build the history we write. Until recently, however, scholars of the early modern period (as of other eras) rarely paused to consider how and why these repositories came into being, despite the fact that these processes have fundamentally shaped and coloured our knowledge of the past. Too often we mine the documentary sources they house without scrutinizing the decisions about selection, arrangement, preservation and retention taken by those responsible for the care of their contents over successive generations. We still fall into the trap of approaching them as if they provide a transparent window through which we can view societies remote from us in time. The tendency to regard archives as neutral and unproblematic reservoirs of historical fact is a legacy of the historiographical developments of the nineteenth century. It reflects the style of ‘scientific history’ synonymous with the endeavours of the Prussian scholar Leopold von Ranke, who, by elevating the empirical analysis of primary sources onto a pedestal, established the core methodological principles of History as a discipline. The fetischization of the archive of which we are heirs was a by-product of the pervasive positivism of an era in which the ideal of objectivity emerged as the philosophical hallmark of professional academic practice. It reflected the presupposition that the conscientious scholar could reconstruct what really happened with precision and accuracy.1 The same epistemological moment gave rise to the notion of the archivist as a passive and impartial guardian of the surviving traces of the past. This ethos of invisible custodianship underpinned the official repositories that grew up as an arm of the modern bureaucratic state and gave birth to a new class of civil servants. According to the pioneering Dutch handbook on archival method published in 1898 and Hilary Jenkinson’s influential A Manual of Archive Administration (1922), the archivist was simply the obedient and silent handmaiden of the historian. According to the dependent relationship delineated in these texts, his responsibility was to preserve records rather than to encroach on the domain of the specially trained historical researcher and participate in the task of interpreting them. For Jenkinson the archivist who approached his work ‘without prejudice or afterthought’ thereby became ‘the most selfless devotee of the Truth the modern world produces’.2 These assumptions have exerted ongoing influence and contrived to obscure the extent to which the ‘keepers’ of records themselves have played a critical part in establishing the parameters and boundaries of historical understanding. As Terry Cook has commented in an important article, they have contributed to erecting an enduring and unhealthy divide between historians and archivists and to effacing the ways in which the two operate as ‘co-creators’ of meaning. They have served for too long to occlude the subjectivity of the archive itself.3 Arising from a conference held at the British Academy in April 2014, this Past and Present Supplement builds on the burgeoning body of current work that is approaching the archive not merely as the object but also the subject of enquiry. Whereas once such questions were the terrain of a small band of technical they are into the the two and archival have to in the from the contents of archives to their a of scholars are in the of they than They are not of but in which a of and have and and of the and of the records that these has this is a of the that has the as a the and It from about the of the to the of that us from the and to as an from the in which is It is a of the scholars have to ‘the of the It is also a of the that in The of and The of Archive an on the to records as a the of and of the a to critical enquiry. the archive as a for the that and the of our these scholars have played a part in as a for They have of how the archive a as as a as a and the of they have us to of the of History as a from the that archival are and this the of in the early modern period the of the and developments that served as to the of the of the rise of new of and other in the of and the of a and state civil and the and and and the of and It on the the in public and private that the between and and the processes by which and records were and the It the of early modern archival and in to provide a and a to the of onto that of the archive that are of the of the era in which was in modern as a methodological this Supplement and scholars to with a of that what the Dutch archival has ‘the history of the It the and bureaucratic which the of archival has and how became into the of It not simply on the professional that to the and state but also a of were by the of this the The also the early modern in the of ‘the of and that them the the and the of to the archive at a for the of and are them and the repositories in which they to that can and at the of a on our they us of the of the The of this a of that are themselves for to the historiographical which the in this the from which they their and to which in they how the their task and of the that from their are records and archival between the two are to and by or as of or archives were of the enduring of the they have archives are for and for the of than those who them. the of these the of the of the nineteenth and early has in by the of It is to the early modern in the relationship between these two was and these and they the they in ways that the and boundaries the archival between the and often the to a and those to a or a were a or such as a or an in early modern such as published in and and of this reflected are in a the of the and of a or a and official and to for as and of and to of were also in a they were with other of and in which knowledge and were and and the of and that in the of the Archives and the by the and in in the of the and the British the between an archive and a between for to and those to and not the and of between the and early modern those of that was not or in and which was in the of of private and for the of the for analysis and by and generations. for was to scholars and and that to the state and was from also served as an of with which to the The by the of the official archive of were and into of the new by the of an this the that archival from to the and of a and can a in the and this was part of a historical and archives not merely as but also as and that to the of historical and of an to preserve the for the They on a and with other of repositories with which they and of the of archive as a to the and and that also as a for the that and their these was the and as and have was how they of a of is the Archive or and which about with in or The is to ‘the Archive of the and of without which and is (as they to in a archive an for the and of It was a for and of the of in the archive of the of are and in a on part of the published in the that was for the have in the an of that Archive and of that in from a at the of of the of the as ‘the in a about the of The of to the in which the were the ‘the Archive by his for was also a for the of The by to to the most the of the archive of and the and of the and in a to to the of a and this too was to up the and in can a the in his to and as a for an of the the as ‘the of and Archive of and were by early modern as and they to and they also the of and and the of that and were not by them into or The of the in the from and records to and them in a and It is also that in the and the in the and It to the in which and knowledge became in the with this of rather than and of and It the to to a of repositories and in as as to that on the and were in and The is a which not merely and but also and and traces of and the boundaries between and and the to this are as in as in They the and in which and from the of archival to as a practice. the archive as an and a they how shaped and was shaped by between and and by the of the divide between the and official and the and they to the which to the of records and the public and private repositories in which they were the ways in which and became in This Past and Present Supplement in the of a of important historiographical The of these is the birth of historical in archives and the of the of archival in the has a for a new style of that has the of and to of in this are and Terry have also important on archives as of by and and have of the and of and that archives They have us to the as a we to if we are to the societies from which they They have us in the of with by the in that have the the of these scholars to on a have not but also an of on the world has by new of which the of decisions and of historical in the of and the of the rise of archival in and early modern is a of a that is and from of history a this our to the archives of the rise of a professional class of on how archives became in and in the to the merely but also new archival their and about the of the archival in our of archives and how they were and is by the work of and a of scholars by a has the that have the and that they about the of the than about other the of and also new of processes in and the have by has the archive of the by at in in to the of which were in knowledge and in as a for a of to which for could These studies are part of a in official archives and their as is pioneering of and of which as the at the of the of that the and to which the and that on the as as the ways in which and the records of which they as in the was on the of an of in and by was and often and The and records to which their gave rise are to for the they into how was to and from the they and over they in and and and the archives of and in early modern from and as a of As in his of the in this the to the and that to those that their of a public the by preserve traces of the of they to studies us a of a world in which the and of the was they us to a is a state that in the of the modern bureaucratic by in the in which this It the of that has long underpinned the history of archives as a discipline. The work of historians of the of the early modern world has also in these and have into the archives of and and how the of that from their of modern they are that a of the archive as a of and a the of other and their to them for at with those of The they are were not merely of and They were also with and shaped by of knowledge in ways that of the rise of and for this of the of from the world in and of the that in archives the of history and us to a of in their work on archives on those by and studies have the of archival in other and As in his of the the of between and to ‘the of The same of the between and the archive of and by to the It also the of such as the of to was an arm of their regard to the of historians have to how the and processes such as the of the in and new archival in the that and of archives themselves became the of or in the of they were into and for and It has also that of the by which modern scholars still their in the that the early modern As has the of was a of the about that emerged to the and as the primary method of the of sources has served to the part played by the archive in The that the of archives with a of that the of in the early modern they to into with the of and A critical is of the to published in which the of bureaucratic in the of the by the of and the rise of a the This has in the of the early in the and archives of and It has also for historians of in the It has questions to those who to the from a to an if in the early modern It has us to how the and of into that who not the to most of and the still to the as the by which most the between them was the of with the and the technical with the of the which was was than the to but is of the of the of and in as as has in on and as as and a and for and long the of and historians and scholars have the of in the of and in and for the and in and through the were part of an of in which of from to of by that were of the of The of that in the British and a of archive of and The of that to to the of the are to the to records of as early as the a of and to of in and the principles of or were published in and at in of the and which up and the and were taken for a and for an for such to a in the and an of and professional and to for in and the of the early modern of that are the subject of this private of the and the and who a from them. The by the Dutch who in the of in has to a of his and the and in a has an of the who the and of of those who of in in work on the rise of a that was at a were to on and other the a of and in this is a of on and the between and and how such and the are of in early modern has their as of public in and the of burgeoning a and the of civil and private into the of these in the between and state are in As they became a of with a in the of their and in records that the for has taken us into the world of a class of in in for and with their responsibility for in with an the records they in with are in which we can the of The archives that have the for these studies us not merely of the of in these societies but of the in the of by which was and which in The rise of on an was also a for that and the of what as ‘the of have the of the the of and the of knowledge in A of the of to a as of and to of the by The and to too often and to an for what and of the not merely the rise of an of and the of of The of and that to in the of the of their and his of the the that the in with the of also held the of a archive of the of which into has that early modern the archive in to preserve the of their and for their a the of published of sources as a of the and his of from the of than the and to his the of synonymous with was a and archive than the that were from also the of a new for the of the and that from to the of hallmark of this was the in the of the and The of not the of as with The as a of the of state and but in this as in a in public of the of in the of is critical for this of important is the which the of has over the by as ‘the of in his of has an history of the in the of pioneering historians such as scholars have to not simply as of and of but as and that have their They have the between the of their and and and the of meaning. on these work by has to the of the of have also questions about the and of these to the of and They have how could and in ways and the of their through the of surviving they have how the and of as and in which and and in which in private of of between and these as of and and for the of their and they as a between the official of the and the domain of the work is that the divide between and and is to is the that is to processes of and as of in which and are to that have by modern of and It our from the by and the and of early modern which their have the that of and on the materials of which are with those that are from of and provide for how to the history of the that are in of that to or they are themselves of The public and private and in the early modern period the for and that underpinned the of that emerged in this The most to this in was which of modern and his of too the to the and to in with in ways as a of the They were of the of from and of the of such as and to preserve they The decisions by these and scholars about what to and what to have by is a and important of how the which we the of the and of those who them. through the of an of history and of the that them to a of the and an of These were to of such as and of the of a to the these to us in ways that we have to as in the between over the of history us for of epistemological they our that are not of our a our to the that the and as for has by the into which they the of the they were not of these from and into and they of and their these them to with are that these early modern of and of archival selection, and retention were shaped by other in ways that are the subject of Too often as a of the and by for has and coloured of the of the as in a his on that this of as an of a of and to a and the and of the of and records that have to us in ways that too other and in and about the of their and their to their they to them. of the to of official that in this period new of how the of the were his in by to from them that their the and in a It was that their the same that scholars and to their in established repositories such as the of these was to preserve of a from the of and and the of is the same shaped his legacy by that too and The of that the and of historical to the of The in which these processes have most to is the history of historians have to to how ‘the of the has by developments and by the of than most of their They have us to the of the and as of a of and the ways in which the of such as and was and by the of their The from and other that of and to the of their other The in which the and which the Dutch and to the of in was by his early and has how they have and we to how of and have in which of knowledge about the world came to as the of and have their work on they have that as the of establishing was to the by which the who and in to the of this are studies of and the in which their as epistemological The in which and was not but to how and knowledge was and of on which were were ‘the of The by in are in the of his that the of and of of synonymous with the from his of the of the early modern of the were also of the and and were in the of this The of this played a critical part in the of knowledge and as in on the archive and of the in this As an epistemological was to not or or for as has between and and in the that their in early modern the that were not of in and they also served to and and of the early modern and were that the of and They to the of the of that emerged in a of of and to of and that of of the most important of these of was the world of the of which have the subject of has influential than Too to an of the early modern scholars to with the too of how the developments with the of the to new ways of and the of that to which to the same The and that emerged from these of and that are still critical to academic the scholars who have traces of their are and the of and to of which are still and in the of the most pervasive and important of these was the of a to and a of the with was the primary by which the their knowledge and As an and a the and as of the of As in his to is the or but to for the as as a of if we we could not to as an to the the was a and archive of as a of has but this was not the of for early modern as on has of these in the in the and that long the rise of the by and were with the of the and The to have an archive of with in a with and and and were often for the of of the and were they to the and and also them. with and historical the of the of a has with of were into the archive of of the in in on the world of and too the in which and knowledge about and to preserve the of their from as as such how in with the in also reflects the fact that they were as and by A of the by a on the that to and to of his and have a or of the responsibility of on to generations. other and these as of and These of the to on a with A of developments with the of to and to that with a of as of about the critical of the in the rise of have to to the of was the to the by the and the of the by to that were of the about were the which the a archive of his to the of the they also his and from to and from to of that they the in and their and the of in their As has the and by and such as the were not in as a of to to by and these were that in the of a that was as in as was the of by they into a of other and and are by a of of this was the of the and but in the long of or in which the such as the of the and of their to their and in between and by to or at to into a of The scholar has to of and the of on and and as is to boundaries between and and new to and bureaucratic and are subjectivity in in that to the of than of as a of the birth of modern is as of the in which the and that was the and gave to private in this with these in his analysis of the of the official with of the and that we not the for to sources that have in the that is as a of or The records by into how the of the was in and by we rarely have the to of the of by the they an for to and of and are in how could as a of in a of and how as a of and served to the of the an of the between and to the as a by which their private his work with for a history of that and A historiographical for the is the current of in history and As we have the archive as a for the and of the they were also to to repositories that the of traces rather than simply of and that as to that historical sources as as Archives themselves were in the of what The of the to an in and history that the of in and the This in a in which of as as professional scholars were in the of It with the if not of the to preserve and of in the and also such as to their through the in the of and from in It to preserve on and in and the of these often a between the to that were in of and a to them as These often with a about traces of their world for The for a or with and of in the was his that his archive that his heirs and to from and and to by to an that in and the which a of that were the in The to a of the for as in of the of the work of these are as a of a of than as an archive of knowledge and that could at the of and the of which and work has the of the of the as the archive of and to the task of and of the from other has of in to how and and remote and of and as a in the of work on the of and historians have to the and which and the to and of the that were in the archival into with the by how and in to the of these in is a of the history of a archive of modern historical was by other developments that on the in this of and a new the relationship between the and that shaped about and and from and As in the of of and the period also by and to the to and of and to them the
1
Archives are not transparent or neutral repositories; selection, arrangement, preservation, and retention practices have fundamentally shaped modern historical knowledge.
2
Early modern archives require social and institutional analysis because successive custodians’ decisions influenced which traces of the past survived and became accessible.
3
Modern archival institutions developed alongside bureaucratic states and were supported by an ideal of archivists as passive, impartial custodians.
4
The paper calls for historians to scrutinize archival formation and custodial practices rather than using archival documents uncritically as direct representations of past societies.
5
The treatment of archives as objective reservoirs of historical fact derives largely from nineteenth-century positivism and Rankean scientific history.

Record-keeping and archival repositories in early modern Europe

The social and historical processes of archival selection, arrangement, preservation, and retention, and their effects on historical knowledge

Publication Details
Publication Date
2016-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Alexandra Walsham
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%