Critical analysis of Russian and foreign hygienic regulations of electromagnetic fields (EMF) created by modern wireless communication and communication systems

Критический анализ российских и зарубежных гигиенических нормативов электромагнитных полей (ЭМП), создаваемых современными системами беспроводной связи и коммуникации
Larisa V. Pokhodzey, Yurij P. Paltsev
2023-06-12

ICNIRP 2020hygienic regulationsnon-thermal bioeffectsradiofrequency electromagnetic fieldswireless communication systems
The authors present a critical analysis of domestic SanPiNs, international recommendations (ICNIRP 2020, EU Council Recommendation 1999/519/EC, EU Directive 2013/35/EC, IEEE Std C95.1-2019) and national standards of the USA, England, Germany, France, China, Italy and Switzerland establishing hygienic regulations for radio frequency band EMF RF created by modern wireless communication and communications systems. It is shown that the RF EMF remote controls in the workplace and for the population, installed in the Russian Federation, are generally the most stringent compared to foreign recommendations, due to different methodological approaches to the hygienic rationing of the factor. In the Russian Federation, hygienic standards of EMF are developed on the basis of comprehensive hygienic, clinical-physiological, epidemiological and chronic experimental studies of bioeffects of non-thermal levels. Most foreign countries use international recommendations as national EMF standards, the basis for determining the threshold level of EMF is the thermal effect. In order to solve the issues of harmonization of hygienic standards of RF EMF, it is necessary to conduct in-depth scientific research to study the features of their biological action and impact on human health. It should be taken into account that the EMFs created by modern wireless communication systems, according to their multi-frequency characteristics, modulation modes, intensity and time parameters, the nature and methods of exposure to workers and the population, differ significantly from EMFs for which there are already existing hygienic standards. Ethics. This study did not require the conclusion of the Ethics Committee.
1
Existing regulations may not adequately represent modern wireless-system EMFs because their frequency structure, modulation, intensity, timing, and exposure patterns differ substantially from those underlying current standards; further research is needed for harmonization.
2
Most foreign countries base national RF EMF standards on international recommendations emphasizing thermal effects as the exposure threshold.
3
Russian occupational and public RF EMF exposure limits are generally stricter than foreign recommendations because they use different hygienic standard-setting methodologies.
4
Russian standards incorporate hygienic, clinical-physiological, epidemiological, and chronic experimental studies of bioeffects at non-thermal exposure levels.
5
The paper critically compares Russian SanPiNs, international recommendations, and national EMF standards across multiple countries for modern wireless communication systems.

Radio-frequency electromagnetic fields (RF EMF) generated by modern wireless communication and communication systems

Critical comparison and harmonization of hygienic exposure regulations, including the biological effects and health impacts of non-thermal RF EMF exposure in workers and the general population

Publication Details
Publication Date
2023-06-12
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
1
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Larisa V. Pokhodzey
Yurij P. Paltsev
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%