FANET Routing Protocol Analysis for Multi-UAV-Based Reconnaissance Mobility Models
Анализ протоколов маршрутизации FANET для моделей мобильности при разведке с использованием нескольких БПЛА
2023-02-25
SCID: 54.1/g5jtjkc3
Discuss with AI
FANET routing protocolsmobility modelsmulti-UAV reconnaissancenetwork connectivitypacket delivery ratio
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Different from mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) and vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs), a flying ad hoc network (FANET) is a very low-density network where node topology changes rapidly and irregularly. These characteristics, the density, mobility, and speed of flight nodes, affect the performance of FANET. Furthermore, application scenarios and environmental settings could affect the performance of FANETs. In this paper, we analyzed the representative FANET protocols, AODV, DSDV, and OLSR, according to mobility models, SRWP, MP, RDPZ, EGM, and DPR, under the multi-UAV-based reconnaissance scenario. We evaluated them in terms of the number of nodes, network connectivity, mobility model’s reconnaissance rate, speed of nodes, and ground control station (GCS) location. As a result, we found that AODV showed the highest PDR performance (81%) with SRWP in multiple UAV-based reconnaissance scenarios. As for a mobility model under the consideration of reconnaissance rate, SRWP was excellent at 76%, and RDPZ and EGM mobility models were reasonable at 62% and 60%, respectively. We also made several interesting observations such as how when the number of nodes increases, the connectivity of the network increases, but the performance of the routing protocol decreases, and how the GCS location affects the PDR performance of the combination of routing protocols and mobility models.
Key Findings
1
AODV achieved the highest packet delivery ratio, reaching 81% with the SRWP mobility model.
2
Considering reconnaissance rate, SRWP performed best at 76%, while RDPZ and EGM achieved 62% and 60%, respectively.
3
Ground control station location affected packet delivery ratio for different routing-protocol and mobility-model combinations.
4
Increasing the number of UAV nodes improved network connectivity but reduced routing-protocol performance.
5
The study evaluates AODV, DSDV, and OLSR across five mobility models in multi-UAV reconnaissance FANET scenarios.
Research Object
FANETs in multi-UAV-based reconnaissance scenarios
Research Subject
The performance of AODV, DSDV, and OLSR routing protocols under different reconnaissance mobility models and network conditions, including packet delivery ratio, connectivity, and effects of node number, speed, reconnaissance rate, and GCS location
Publication Details
Publication Date
2023-02-25
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
58
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest