Ligation versus no ligation of spontaneous portosystemic shunts during liver transplantation: Audit of a prospective series of 66 consecutive patients

Лигирование или нелигирование спонтанных портосистемных шунтов при трансплантации печени: анализ проспективной серии из 66 последовательных пациентов
Concepción Gómez Gavara, Prashant Bhangui, Chady Salloum, Michael Osseis, Francesco Esposito, Toufic Moussallem, Eylon Lahat, Liliana Fuentes, Philippe Compagnon, Norbert Ngongang, Chétana Lim, Daniel Azoulay
2017-12-23

liver transplantationportal vein thrombosispostoperative encephalopathyshunt ligationspontaneous portosystemic shunts
The management of large spontaneous portosystemic shunt (SPSS) during liver transplantation (LT) is a matter of debate. The aim of this study is to compare the short-term and longterm outcomes of SPSS ligation versus nonligation during LT, when both options are available. From 2011 to 2017, 66 patients with SPSS underwent LT: 56 without and 10 with portal vein thrombosis (PVT), all of whom underwent successful thrombectomy and could have portoportal reconstruction. The SPSS were either splenorenal (n = 40; 60.6%), left gastric (n = 16; 24.2%), or mesenterico-iliac (n = 10; 15.1%). Following portoportal anastomosis, the SPSS was ligated in 36 (54.4%) patients and left in place in 30 (45.5%) patients, based on the effect of the SPSS clamping/unclamping test on portal vein flow during the anhepatic phase. Intraoperatively, satisfactory portal flow was obtained in both groups. Primary nonfunction (PNF) and primary dysfunction (PDF) rates did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Nonligation of SPSS was significantly associated with a higher rate of postoperative encephalopathy (P < 0.001) and major postoperative morbidity (P = 0.02). PVT occurred in 0 and 3 patients in the ligated and nonligated shunt group, respectively (P = 0.08). A composite end point, which included the relevant complications in the setting of SPSS in LT (ie, PNF and PDF, PVT, and encephalopathy) was present in 16 (44.4%) and 22 (73.3%) patients of the ligated and nonligated shunt group, respectively (P = 0.02). Patient (P = 0.05) and graft (P = 0.02) survival rates were better in the ligated shunt group. In conclusion, the present study supports routine ligation of large SPSS during LT whenever feasible. Liver Transplantation 24 505-515 2018 AASLD.
1
Both ligation and nonligation achieved satisfactory intraoperative portal flow, with no significant differences in primary nonfunction or primary dysfunction rates.
2
In 66 liver transplant recipients with large spontaneous portosystemic shunts, shunts were ligated in 36 patients and left untreated in 30 based on intraoperative portal-flow testing.
3
Nonligation was associated with significantly higher postoperative encephalopathy and major morbidity; portal vein thrombosis occurred in 3 nonligated versus 0 ligated patients.
4
Patient and graft survival were better in the ligated group, supporting routine ligation of large spontaneous portosystemic shunts when feasible.
5
The composite complication endpoint occurred less frequently after ligation than nonligation (44.4% versus 73.3%; P = 0.02).

Large spontaneous portosystemic shunts in patients undergoing liver transplantation

Short- and long-term clinical outcomes and complications of shunt ligation versus nonligation during liver transplantation

Publication Details
Publication Date
2017-12-23
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Concepción Gómez Gavara
Prashant Bhangui
Chady Salloum
Michael Osseis
Francesco Esposito
Toufic Moussallem
Eylon Lahat
Liliana Fuentes
Philippe Compagnon
Norbert Ngongang
Chétana Lim
Daniel Azoulay
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%